25420 Resistance to Training

“For rebellion is as the sin of divination, and insubordination
 is as iniquity and idolatry. Because you have rejected the word of the LORD, 
He has also rejected you from being king.”
 
—1 Samuel 15:23, NASB

 This is a foundation block, a key in training children: all our actions must issue from a wellspring of affection, tenderness, love, kindness, and long-suffering.

In the last lesson, the emphasis was placed upon the importance of love as a foundation for training the child. But every parent soon encounters the child’s resistance to training—no matter how lovingly, or tenderly, or compassionately the child is treated. The material in this lesson deals with this problem.

Expect Resistance to Training

The following Bible verses indicate the need for discipline and imply that resistance to training is normal and can be expected: Proverbs 13:24; 15:10; 19:18; 22:15; 29:15; Ephesians 6:4; Hebrews 12:11. If you think your children will be delighted with everything you want them to do, you have an expectation that is unrealistic. If you intend to keep your children smiling all day long, you are tackling a futile venture. If you consider yourself a failure because your children don’t like what you want them to do at times, you misunderstand the nature of your children. They want their own way. You can expect resistance.

Your Responsibility

“Train up” your child.

A father tells of an incident that arose with his very beautiful daughter. She was offered a contract to become a model. There was only one obstacle in the way. Her dad would have to falsify her age on the contract because she was too young. She came home very happy and enthusiastic about this opportunity.

It would mean two hundred dollars a week for her while she was going to high school. Her mind was made up. However, because of his spiritual wisdom and personal integrity, her father refused to allow her to accept the contract. She argued: “Aren’t you interested in my future? What kind of a dad are you?”

She accused him of not loving her and not caring for her welfare. What was he to do? It was a very emotion-packed problem. However, there was a very simple solution. It is not right to lie about anything. He might expect that his daughter would be somewhat less than delighted with his decision. A father cannot always expect his children to appreciate his position. However, he must do the right thing.

The Bible does not teach us to humor the desires of our children. It does say, “Train up a child in the way he should go” (Proverbs 22:6). It does not even imply that he will appreciate your training. He may stubbornly resist you every inch of the way. The parent must remember that he is doing the training. Because he is the trainer, he must have some concept of the goals toward which he is working. The day will probably come when the young woman who aspired to be a model will look back on this experience with her dad and say, “I’m glad he did it.” That she may not be able to appreciate it now, he can understand. He should be kind and gentle and patient, but firm in his allegiance to what he knows to be right and best. She does not understand now, but some day she will.

We have all gone through periods when we could not have what we wanted and could not understand why. Yet, when we look back through the telescope of the years, discipline and denial make sense. We need not be so concerned with our children’s reaction to our discipline. The important thing is our wholesome reaction to their reaction.

Express True Love

The mother of a young child asks, “What do you do with a child who won’t do what you want her to do?” For example, she tells the child not to eat crackers in the living room. The child takes the crackers and eats them in the living room. If she insists on the child’s going back into the kitchen, the child begins to cry and says, “You don’t love me.” The psychology books say you should be sure your children know you love them. How do you demonstrate your love? By giving in? This child discovered that if, in her sweet little three-and-one-half-year-old style, she looked up at her mother and said, “You don’t love me,” her mother would take her up in her arms and say: “I do love you. You can eat crackers in the living room.” It is no wonder this girl is a neighborhood problem. Her mother says so and everybody agrees with her.

When your child questions your love, do you let him evaluate your affection for him? Who is a better judge of your love, the little child or you? Sometimes a young child may blurt out the truth to a parent who is motivated by resentment and hatred. But if in a tender, gentle way this mother can teach this little child that crackers are to be eaten in the kitchen, not in the living room; if she can demonstrate that whether the child pouts or screams, or throws herself on the floor, nothing will alter mother’s genuine affection for her, then she need not fear the child’s statement.

We are to “train up a child in the way he should go.” This is a foundation block, a key in training children: all of our actions must issue from a wellspring of affection, tenderness, love, kindness, and long-suffering.

Maintain the Right Spirit

When dealing with children, you must appreciate the fact that they are beset with the universal human weakness common to us all—the tendency to rebel or do wrong. However, you must hold up the standard and be the best example that you can. When you fail to live up to your standard, you should be just as quick to acknowledge it as you are to correct your child. All of us should have as our standard the conformity to Christ’s image (2 Corinthians 3:18; Ephesians 4:13). We are all to aim in that direction. Nevertheless, we are subject to the same temptations that our children face, and therefore we should have some appreciation of their deviations.

It is not unusual to go through some rough waters during the course of any day. Especially is this true in families where parents hold standards that are different from those of the majority of people. These standards may be challenged with all the vehemence of a youthful heart, just as parents challenged standards when they were young. But be careful that your training has a compassionate heart at its base. When your children challenge your standards and you must discipline them, be sure your spirit is what it should be. How do you show your love for a child? By training him in the way he should go.

Do not lower your standards

A boy who took a Red Cross swimming course failed in the final examination. The instructor naturally refused to give him a certificate. The boy went home sad and tearful because he had flunked the course. This touched the dad, who wanted to spare his son grief. Thinking he was doing the boy a favor, the father used his influence to get his son a certificate through a friend. As a result, the boy was given a Red Cross emblem to sew on his bathing suit. Sometime later, while swimming with other boys who wore the same emblem, but who had passed the course, he dived into some deep water; and trying but failing to keep up with the other boys, he was drowned. Did his dad really do him a favor? Was this an expression of love? Was it the proper reaction to the boy?

At a popular restaurant a sign posted at the entrance read, “No shoes, no shirt, no service.” A group not wearing shoes approached the hostess, turned on all their youthful charm, and used all their persuasive power to get in without shoes. The hostess finally yielded. Did she do them a favor? A sign that says, “No shoes, no shirt, no service,” means nothing if people don’t enforce it. An unenforced law is a farce. What did these youths learn? They found out that if you turn on enough charm, use plenty of persuasion, and apply the right kind of pressure, you can sometimes have what you want. They found that, for a time, there seems to be a way to get around the law. Is it fair to the youngsters to allow them to lower the standard? It is an unfortunate lesson for them to learn.

When you get something you are not supposed to have, you do not enjoy it. Your own conscience judges that you have no right to it; nevertheless, it is natural to want to violate standards, to cross limits. These examples illustrate this resistance to training. It is normal and can be expected.

Sin Is the Root of Resistance

What Is Sin?

The Bible tells us that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23). What is sin? This is a word that many people dislike. At this point it will be helpful to review Lesson 4. Sin is selfishness. This includes bitterness, stubbornness, rebellion, anger, wrath, malice, hostility, and disobedience to parents. As we look upon our tender little ones, they seem clean and pure and innocent. We wish they were as innocent as they look, but we know that in their hearts lies the potential for all kinds of sin.

Children are Sinners

No one yet has presented the problem of a child who never disobeys. Did you ever hear of a child like that? To rebel is normal. It is part of human nature. Every time you give birth to a child you bring a rebel, a sinner, into the world. You may not like this, and the fact may make you feel uncomfortable. You wish it were not true, and many cannot believe it is. Both the Bible and experience, however, tell us that it is true. The minute you set a limit, your child will tend to want to break it. This is as normal as breathing. This applies not only to children. All of us have the tendency to rebellion.

Parents are Sinners

One of the biggest battles in counseling with tense, anxious, frustrated Christians is that of convincing them that they have sinned. “Are we not finished with sin when we are saved?” they ask. What is it that causes two Christians to have violent differences? It is sin (1 Corinthians 3:3). Transgression of the law in any detail is sin. The Bible tells us that “whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles in one point, he has become guilty of all” (James 2:10). If we could only realize the subtlety of sin! If only as Christian adults we could grasp the truth that when we have said or felt or thought or desired something that is out of line with the revealed will of God, this is displeasing to God and is sin! If we would maintain a constant spirit of repentance, we could save ourselves the frustrations of many a tense, anxious day and many a sleepless night. The next time you find yourself wrought up or trying to control your tongue from saying something that you know is not right, be honest with yourself. Be honest with God. Get off by yourself in a quiet place and confess and repent.

Degrees of Rebellion May Vary

In training children, we find that they all tend to be rebellious. It is true that there are different degrees of rebellion. The first child may be easygoing. A second child may be a violent rebel. The third child may be a silent rebel. These are all different degrees of the manifestation of sin. Anyone who has two children will tell you how different one is from the other. You wonder how your training could produce such variations. Anyone who has three will tell you how different each of them is from the other two! There is not necessarily anything wrong with you or your training. It is just that people are different, and we rebel in different ways and degrees. Some of us can do wrong in the most gracious way.

An example of gracious rebellion was observed in a nursery school. A little boy was there who had been told not to climb up on a table. He did so anyway. One of the women was about to scold him and take him down. He saw her coming, stretched out his arms, with a big smile wrapped his little arms around her, and before she could say anything, he said, ”I’m sorry.” She was about to say, “Get off the table!” Instead, she very gently put him down on the floor. She had no more than turned her back when he climbed on the table again. This child was just as rebellious as the child who might defiantly climb on the table. The diplomatic boy was just as wrong as a disagreeable child would have been—both disobedient.

Over and over, wherever there are children in this world, parents ask: “What am I going to do with my child? He won’t listen!” Of course, he won’t listen. A little child is rebellious and tends to do what he wants to do. Some children will be pleasant about it, and some will be objectionable about it. Either response manifests the same principle—man tends to rebel. Do you see how you can be far out of line and be very sweet about it? This is just as disobedient as being unpleasant. If you put two or more children together to play and leave them alone without any adult supervision, it will not be long before there is a conflict. Conflict among people in every age group is just as normal as breathing.

The Cure for Resistance

You should be rearing your children with the consciousness that they need a Savior and that they need a Keeper. They must find the power of God that will enable them to live right. You can control your children with stares, threats, promises, rewards, and many other techniques. The only effective control, however, is that of the child’s being motivated by a love for God—not only by a love for you or a fear of you.

A mother, speaking of a son who had gotten into some trouble, said: “I am so glad he didn’t tell me about these terrible things he has done until I returned from my trip. It would have spoiled my vacation.” This mother was as serious as she could be. She did not realize that her boy needed a better reason for being good than that of keeping his mother from fretting. She had told him that her happiness depended upon his behaving himself.

You must have a much better reason than this for asking your children to conform. If you use the threat of your own unhappiness, you deny the very essence of being and living as a Christian. And what is meant by that? Just this: no matter how cantankerous your children are and no matter how upsetting the affairs of your life may be, your peace of mind in Christ should be independent of circumstances. You should teach your children these things, and they will learn them best by seeing a demonstration (Philippians 4:5-7). These are not just beautiful words. Peace, comfort, consolation, and joy should be your daily experience by faith in God through the Lord Jesus Christ. The resistance to your training should develop these qualities in you.

Study Assignment for Lesson 10

  1. Look up and study all the Scripture used or mentioned in the text.
  2. How should we expect children to act? Give examples.
  3. How should rebellion be handled? What is the importance of the parent’s attitude?
  4. What is the relationship of the problem of sin to rearing children?
  5. Show how rebellion can be manifested in different ways.
  6. What is the solution to the control of a child’s rebellious ways?

Personal Evaluation Test 5

Check up on yourself as a parent.

Answer the following “Yes,” “No,” or “Sometimes”

______   1. Am I seeking to make disciples of my children?

______   2. Am I a good example to my children?

______   3. Do I chasten my children in a fit of temper?

______   4. Am I sarcastic to my children?

______   5. When I say no, do I mean NO?

______   6. Do I get angry when my children resist me?

______   7. Do all my actions toward my children stem from affection, kindness and longsuffering?

______   8. Do I express my love to my children by training them in the way they should go?

______   9. Do I turn the cold shoulder to my children to keep them in line?

______   10. Do I constantly change my standards?

Click here to check your answers.

 

Self-Check Test 10

Are you making progress?

In the space provided, mark the following statements “True” or “False.”

______   1. All parents can expect resistance from their children.

______   2. A parent must have some concept of the goals toward which he is working
                  in training his children.

______   3. When a child questions his parents’ love, the child’s challenge should be
                  accepted at its face value.

______   4. The spirit in which discipline is administered is an important factor, especially
                  when children challenge parental standards.

______   5. An unenforced law is a farce.

______   6. It is only small children who have the tendency toward rebellion.

______   7. All children react alike to training and discipline.

______   8. Conflict among people in every age group is just as normal as breathing.

______   9. Threats, promises, and rewards guarantee that a child will be properly
                  motivated to obey.

______   10. Resistance to parental training should develop high qualities in parents.

Click here for the answers to these questions.

25421 Setting Limits

“You shall set bounds for the people all around, saying,
‘Beware that you do not go up on the mountain or touch the border of it;
whoever touches the mountain shall surely be put to death.’”
 
—Exodus 19:12, NASB

The setting of limits is inherent in the need for authority and security. Just as our God sets limits for us, enforcing them by chastisement, so should we with our children.

Happy parenthood involves the willing acceptance of the task of training children. It is natural that we should be puzzled from time to time by the behavior of our children. Growing up in a world of television, babysitters, and nuclear fission is something new. A great change has taken place in family relationships, and most of us have moments of doubt: are we being too strict or too lenient?

Amid a rapidly changing world, there are still some fixed points for the guidance of Christian parents. There are some methods that you can follow for training your children in the way they should go. Four of these are setting limits, supervision, help, and a positive approach. This lesson will consider setting limits; Lesson 12 will discuss the other three. These rules of action are emphasized in the Word of God as principles for Christian living. (Study Galatians 6:1; 1 Peter 5:2-3; 1 Timothy 3:4; Exodus 20 and related verses that you may find.)

The Necessity for Limits

Whenever one life crosses another, it is necessary to establish certain guidelines to make possible friendly relations. These guidelines, whether written or followed by mutual consent, prescribe and limit activity—do’s and don’ts. We refer to them here as limits. The fewer limits the better, but the ones you set must be firm, definite, fair, and consistent. From pre-school age on up, limits are necessary. In the home or neighborhood, the smallest children need certain limits pertaining to safety, sharing, destroying, hurting others, taking turns, and respecting others’ feelings.

It should be understood that children will never maintain limits perfectly. Parents often ask, “How often must I tell that child to behave before he will do it?” The answer is, “Constantly.” Children have their ups and downs just as adults do. However, the pre-school child does make a beginning toward accepting limits. For example, a teacher was showing a three-year-old boy the meaning of sharing toys with other children. Sometime later she was looking on as he and another boy were playing together. The three-year-old slipped up to the other child, who was playing with a little car, grabbed it out of his hand, and said, “Let’s share.” How you handle such an incident is important. This little boy was just beginning to learn the concept of sharing, even though he misunderstood. He needed some careful teaching, not a scolding.

Agreement on Limits

The limits set in any family should be mutually agreeable to both the father and the mother; otherwise, children learn to play one parent against the other. To illustrate, at a banquet in a church one evening Jimmy whispered to his mother, “May I go to the car and play the radio?” “No, you may not!” she replied. So Jimmy watched until his mother was engaged in conversation. He then quietly turned to his father and said, “How about the keys to the car, Dad, so I can go out and listen to the radio?” Without thinking, Dad reached in his pocket, gave his son the keys, and Jimmy disappeared outside. When Dad and Mom came to themselves and realized what had happened, they found it hard to apply discipline because they themselves had disagreed. This is not an unusual occurrence, is it? It is important that husbands and wives be in agreement on limits. The older children become, the more clever they are in pitting one parent against the other. Therefore, it is important that from the early stages of your marriage you accept the fact that whenever one person’s life crosses another there must be some definite understanding so that the relationship may develop smoothly.

Limits and Neighbors

When it comes to training children, the responsibility for carrying out limits lies with the parent. The character and the understanding of the parent are much more trustworthy than the understanding of the child.

The following experience of one parent illustrates the fact that your limits may not be appreciated by your children and seemingly are not always appreciated by the neighbors.

This parent felt that her child should not cross the busy highway on his bicycle. The other parents in the neighborhood said to their children, “If the rest of the mothers say their children can do it, you can do it.” The gang would go to this woman’s house and plead, but she would say, “No! you can’t do it.” Her child was distraught. “Everybody else’s mother says we can go. You always keep us from going” — as much as to say, “What kind of a mother are you?”

After this happened a few times, the children went once again with the same request. All the other mothers said they could go. Finally, the harassed mother yielded to the pressure and let them go. Suddenly she was hailed as a wonderful mother because the children could have their way. But they had hardly gotten started when the telephone rang. One of the neighbors had called, saying, “Did you tell the children they could cross the street?” “Why, yes.” The neighbor replied, “We were depending on you not to let your child go.”

To have a happy home you may hold standards or values that will seem odd to the neighbors; or your neighbors may silently respect you. In either case, you had better do what is right before God, not what is right in your child’s eyes, or perhaps in the eyes of the mother next door. And if the mother next door doesn’t like this, you still must be pleasant to her from your heart. This requires complete consecration and yieldedness to God.

Limits Outside the Home

It is important for small children to have supervised contacts outside the home. This is important because limits outside the home are different from those within the home. Adults not in the family will react differently also. A child’s first attempts to approach other children or his reactions to being approached by other children are usually similar to those at home. If he is accustomed to taking what he wants, asking for what he wants, or looking longingly at what he wants, he will do so outside the home. However, the response to his approach by other children or adults may be different from what he is accustomed to at home. His approach, successful at home, may be unsuccessful outside the home.

To illustrate, a four-year-old girl, the only child in the family, and the pride and joy of her parents, went to nursery school. She had learned her manners well. Whenever she wanted something, she would say, “Please, may I have it?” Her parents would then grant her most of her requests. At school she walked up to a little girl nearby and said, “Please, may I have that doll?” “No,” was the answer. The four-year-old returned to her mother with a puzzled look on her face and explained, “I said please, and she won’t give it to me.” The mother, too, looked puzzled. The teacher told the mother and child that what might be a successful approach in the home would not necessarily work outside the home. The other child had rights also. It is important that a young child should have such contacts at her own age level outside the home, so that she can learn the facts of life four-year-old style.

Adults Have Limits

The following excerpts from a father’s letter to his son at graduation time, though written as humor, convey a vital message:

Dear Son,

I’m sure you are thrilled by the idea of taking your place at last in adult affairs—a station of life you probably look upon as a time when “big people” will stop telling you to do things … or not to do things …. Your dad has found out that the chains of adult life are wrought of stiffer stuff than the feeble fetters of childhood. Believe me, no one ever suffered a furrowed brow from such simple commands as “Eat your cereal” …. “Do your homework” …. “Report for band practice.” What once may have seemed a terribly harsh order, “Put away your comic book,” will pale into insignificance when compared with “Cut out all pastries and sweets.”

The bigger you get, the bigger other people seem to get—if not bigger in stature, then bigger in authority.

For example, did you see the look on dad’s face when the Internal Revenue man ordered him to report to the collector’s office with his last year’s tax receipts? … When a traffic officer says, “Pull over to the curb,” dad pulls. When grandmother says, “Roll up the window,” dad rolls up …. I just want to prepare you for a lifetime of saying, “Yes, sir,” to master sergeants, shop foremen, loan company executives, bank tellers, tradesmen, public officials, car dealers, game wardens, and a host of other people you never dreamed were your superiors. Even the most politely phrased commands, like “Please remit” or “Kindly step back in the bus” are still commands. Ushers will order you down an aisle; headwaiters will tell you where to sit; courts will summon you for jury duty; the city hall will notify you to shovel the snow off your sidewalk.

You will be dragged off to parties at other people’s houses, and dragged out of bed by people who come to your house. You will be kept off the grass by policemen and kept up by week end guests. You will be put on committees and put off busses. This is the true life beyond commencement. Congratulations and good luck.

Dad

P. S. Get a haircut for graduation.

This letter illustrates some of the reasons why small children need to begin learning about limits and living by them.

The following quotation gives some additional reasons which point out basic needs that limits can help meet:

[God’s] love (Hebrews 12:6) meets a real need; His love is strong enough and wise enough to set limits. These God-given limits mean wonderful, comforting freedom from worry and uncertainty ….

The most important aspect of being an adequate father is the acceptance and handling of authority … accepting someone’s authority over and responsibility for you, accepting the place of authority over and responsibility over others.

Without the setting of limits, by virtue of authority, there is no security. Knowing exactly where “the old man” draws the line, just what are the limits, and that they are well enforced means a happy, efficient organization. A taut ship is a happy ship.

The setting of limits is inherent in the need for authority and security. Just as our God sets limits for us, enforcing them by chastisement, so should we with our children. The setting of intelligent, thoughtful, reasonable limits is a God-delegated duty—limits that are in line with the needs of the child and appropriate to his age, understanding and moral values.

We need to avoid meeting our own needs or whims in disciplining the child while striving to meet his—in keeping with moral principles and a Christian testimony …. As the child grows in knowledge and understanding of God’s Word, authority is transferred from you, the natural father, to God, the heavenly Father. … Have you surrendered, or only complied with, God’s authority?¹

¹Norwell J. Peterson, “The Father—God’s Surrogate,” Christian Medical Journal, January-February, 1957, pages 9, 10.

Study Assignment for Lesson 11

  1. What do we mean by “setting limits?” What is the reason for them and how do they pertain to training children?
  2. Why should children be taught limits outside the home?
  3. Contrast the limits of adulthood with those of childhood.
  4. What is the relationship between the authority of parents and the authority of God? between security and setting limits?
  5. What problems are involved regarding neighbors and their setting of limits for a happy home?

Self-Check Test 11

Mark the following statements “True” or “False.”

______   1. Happy parenthood involves the willing acceptance of the task of training children.

______   2. The great change which has taken place in family relationships in recent years has removed all fixed points for the guidance of Christian parents.

______   3. Children can be expected to maintain limits perfectly.

______   4. The limits set in any family should be mutually agreeable to both parents.

______   5. The ultimate responsibility for carrying out limits lies with the child.

______   6. The limits set by a family should always conform to those set by other families.

______   7. Limits outside the home are identical with those within the home.

______   8. The child who has learned to get his own way at home will be sure always to get his own way outside the home.

______   9. One of the joys of adulthood is that limits and restraints no longer need to be observed.

______   10. The setting of intelligent, thoughtful, reasonable limits is a God-delegated duty of parents.

Click here for the answers to these questions.

25422 Supervision and Help

“…then watch yourself, that you do not forget the LORD
who brought you from the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery.”
 
—Deuteronomy 6:12, NASB

Parenthood is a big task. This course has been written to help you move in the right direction. Lesson 12 gives pointers on help and supervision and on your approach in handling children. This concluding lesson does not exhaust the responsibilities involved in being an adequate parent. However, this course has been designed to give you some important “Keys to Happy Family Living.” As you apply the understanding derived from this study, you should be a better parent.

Helping Children to Learn

Help children keep limits

Do you remember the boy who was learning to share? It is important to handle an incident like this carefully. Here was a child who was just beginning to grasp a new idea. He still did not correctly understand it. He needed a little help. The teacher had to go to the boy and in a very gentle and firm manner say, “You must give it back. When he is through with the car, you may have it.” The boy did not want to give it back, but his playmate also had his rights. The car was to be shared only after his playmate had kept it for a reasonable time.

Help in applying the rule

You can give a child a simple rule or a simple reason. You do not need to repeat that reason twenty times. What your child needs is a little help in applying the rule. In the case of the two small boys, this help meant taking the car from one boy and giving it back to his playmate. The offender in this situation did not need to be punished; he did need to be helped.

We must work with our children in the spirit of a helpful teacher. Remember that everything is not taught in one day. You have many years to train your children. This necessitates understanding and consistency, gentleness and fairness. We adults are still struggling with some of these principles of right living. We cannot expect our children to become perfect overnight. It is easy for us to tell them to share their toys, but how freely in heart do we share our lawn mower or our automobile? Children value their possessions much as we do ours.

Help in accepting limits

All children need help in accepting limits. A four-year-old girl is an example of this. Her mother, in despair, said, “I am rearing a little delinquent.” This was true. The child was the terror of the block. Today this child is developing normally because her mother learned from a friendly neighbor the secret of setting reasonable limits and helping the child observe them.

One day this little four-year-old was playing in the neighbor’s house. She had scattered blocks all over the room. She decided that it was time to go home and went to the closet to get her coat. The neighbor said, in his firm way, “We should pick up the blocks before you go.” ”I’m not picking up any blocks,” she responded. She proceeded to the closet. This little girl needed someone to help her take care of the blocks. Realizing the child’s need, the neighbor, gently but firmly, led her back to the center of the room. The child wasn’t going to pick up any blocks, and it was a real struggle for the neighbor to help her. With her hand in his, he picked up a block and put it away. He picked up the second one and the third one. She said, “Leave me alone. I’ll do it myself.” He left her alone, but the minute he released his hand, she darted toward the closet. He went after her and brought her back. She was very rebellious and needed some more external help. She did not need a scolding or a threat or a spanking. Those techniques had been tried unsuccessfully by her mother. The neighbor started over again with the child’s hand in his. She did not like it. She protested, but they were getting the job done. He was not doing it for her. He was doing it with her. This is a very important principle. She was not just standing there watching him. Again she said, “Let me alone. I’ll do it myself.” He let her go. This time she stood there to watch him do it. He took her hand in his and started at the job again. Finally, the third time she said, “Let me alone.” He let her alone, and she started doing it herself.

It is true that he did most of the work. It would have been easier for him to do it all himself, but this would not have taught the child what she needed to learn. He did not alienate that child; in fact, his house was her favorite spot for play. She knew that in his home there were definite boundaries, whereas she did not have the security of known limits in her own home. If she yelled, kicked, and screamed, to quiet her the parents would adjust the limits they had set up.

If a child screams in his rebellion, it is more important to see to it that he observes the limits than that his screaming be stopped. The issue should not be, “Stop your screaming.” A child persists in screaming only when he gets the desired results. However, there does not have to be any conditional position in your own mind. If your request is fair and reasonable, then with all kindness help your child fulfill it. You will not make an invalid out of him. You will be teaching him.

Supervision Is Needed

Supervision is necessary wherever limits are set up. This is not only true for children, but also for adults. Most fathers are supervised on their jobs. Why do businesses and big corporations spend many thousands of dollars on supervision? It is normal for all of us to wander away from prescribed limits. This is graphically stated in Romans 3:12: “ALL HAVE TURNED ASIDE, TOGETHER THEY HAVE BECOME USELESS; THERE IS NONE WHO DOES GOOD, THERE IS NOT EVEN ONE.”

Parents ought not to be disappointed if their children need supervision or help. This is the major task and privilege of parenthood. Consider Proverbs 29:15, 17:

“The rod and reproof give wisdom, But a child who gets his own way brings shame to his mother. …. Correct your son, and he will give you comfort; He will also delight your soul.”

Parenthood, therefore, involves a combination of setting limits and then supervising and helping our children so that the limits will be observed.

Help children by demonstration

Another example of this principle of help involves several children playing around a slide. One child had begun to use the slide, and then all the children wanted to use it. Each one wanted to be first, but children need to learn the principle of taking turns. A wise adult approached and gave help. He chose Mary at random and said: “Mary, you first; Johnny is next; and Sally is after Johnny. Tommy is after Sally,” and so on. Soon these children understood the idea of taking turns. They merely needed help by means of a demonstration.

Follow up orders that are not obeyed

Distinguish between words and a real limit

Your children will make a distinction between words and a real limit at your house. You might say, for example, “Children, we are going to eat now.” No one moves. You are in the middle of mashing potatoes and not ready yourself. Your family gets accustomed to your chatter as a worker gets accustomed to the noise in a factory. The noise is there, but they don’t hear it. The same thing happens in a family if you just talk about limits but are not bound by them yourself and are not prepared to carry them through. You are wasting your time by yelling if you do not follow through. This confusion only creates an unwholesome atmosphere in your home.

Some children were playing in a neighbor’s yard. A mother called from across the fence, “Johnny!” Johnny kept on playing. She called a second time and a third. One of the children heard it and said, “Johnny, your mother wants you to go home.” “Oh, I don’t have to go home yet.” Finally, the mother called again with a much different tone and volume, “Johnny!” Some of us have two kinds of voices. There is the voice that means “Hop to it this minute!” and there is the voice the child does not associate with action. A mother may wonder what is the matter with her child because he will not respond to her call. Often the reason is that she is not prepared to follow through. If she calls, she should be prepared to follow up her call. It is the intent to carry things out that makes a difference.

Another mother tells this story: “I want my daughter to take the garbage out. So I ask her in my most pleasant voice, ‘Will you please take the garbage out to the bin?’ The child does not move. I ask her again and again in a pleasant voice, but with no response. My question is, ‘How long do you have to be agreeable before you can get angry?’ Usually about the fourth time I am really irritated. I stop washing dishes, wipe my hands on my apron, and go see that she obeys me. When I do this, my daughter knows I mean business, and she does what I tell her. Why won’t my child mind until I get angry?”

Enforce limits rigidly in kindness

There is an easy solution. The girl does not respond to her mother’s request until about the fourth time because she has learned by experience that her mother does not intend to follow through until then. The mother is attempting to set up a positive limit; namely, that it is her daughter’s job to take out the garbage; but the child knows that only the angry voice and not the pleasant voice means, “You must do it right now!” Could not the child just as easily learn by experience that the quiet voice carries the positive command as well as the angry voice? The simple solution is for mother to enforce her first and not her fourth request.

The secret of discipline is the setting of reasonable limits and enforcing them rigidly in kindness. If you say, “It is bedtime,” set down whatever you are doing and in a kind but firm manner, help your child do what you want him to do.

Positive Approach in Supervision

Many times in a day your child will need your help with dressing, eating, playing, carrying out a task, obeying a limit. You will need to be continually redirecting an activity, resolving a conflict with another child, and the like. Many times in a day, an adult decision followed by appropriate action is necessary.

The positive approach

A little boy four years of age was in an ugly mood. He was looking for trouble. When his playmate came along, he knocked him down and was pounding him. His mother pulled him off. He was kicking, screaming, and yelling as she marched him into the house. He hissed: “Let me alone. I’m going to cut you up in pieces and throw you in the garbage can!” Mother replied: “I know you feel that way, but until you cool off you cannot be out there with the rest of the children. I’ll just wait here with you until you do.”

She did not react negatively to his negative behavior. She was firm with him, and isolated him until he cooled off. This is what is meant by a positive approach. We can, by God’s grace, maintain a spirit of tenderness, kindness, and gentleness regardless of the child’s behavior. Parents need not look at every incident that happens during the day as a crisis, but as part of a continuing learning process. Parents must remember that they are teachers. Accordingly, any incident should be viewed in the perspective of years of learning.

The following incident occurred in a nursery school, where the teachers were making good progress with a boy who had been accustomed to biting other children who resisted him. He had not bitten anyone for a long time. This day he came in sleepy and crabby. He wanted a tricycle that a playmate was using. The playmate refused to give it up, so the ill-natured boy bit him. As the teachers approached the children, both boys were in tears. One could see that the offender knew he had done wrong. One teacher hurried to his playmate to reassure him. The other teacher hurried to the crabby boy and took him into a corner. She said, “You forgot, didn’t you?” “Yeah, I forgot,” he answered. In this case, her approach was much more effective than if she had glared at him and said, “You little brat! I ought to whip the daylights out of you for doing that!” It was clear that he was sorry. The teacher went on to remind him that there were people who could help him get what he wanted. Soon he got up, went to one of the women and said, “Will you help me get a tricycle, please?”

Do you see the underlying principle here? It is not suggested that you let your children run wild. That must be emphasized. You can deal with your child’s most obnoxious behavior in a gentle but firm way. There is a difference between gentle firmness and hostile firmness. A basic tenderness for the child, no matter what the behavior at the moment, is an important invisible help in training children. The boy who was pounding his playmate was handled very differently from the boy who bit his playmate. In either case, the key to the situation was the manner of the adults involved. Kindly and firmly insisting that children behave is far more effective than indulging them, letting them run wild, or allowing them their every whim. A positive approach toward the boy who bit his playmate helped him learn to overcome frustration.

The key to a positive approach is an overall kind feeling for children, not a reaction to what they do at the moment. It takes many years for a child to become an adult. Parents need to be consistent. As parents “train up a child in the way he should go,” they can rejoice in the promise of the Word of God that “when he is old he will not depart from it” (Proverbs 22:6).

Dealing with the Unpredictable

Over and over again, parents are faced with unexpected incidents involving the child, incidents which give endless variety and humor to the task of parenthood. It is at such moments that the basic spirit of the parent is on trial. A positive approach is needed at these unexpected moments if it is ever needed. There are, of course, those times when you can carefully weigh all sides of a matter, when you will discuss it and plan carefully what you will say and do. However, the snap decision and the way you react to it really set the tone in your home.

The following illustration clarifies what is meant by the unexpected incident:

One morning a mother of three children walked into the kitchen. She was humming happily to herself as she entered. The three boys were grouped around the kitchen sink chattering good-naturedly. She thought to herself that they were getting along agreeably together. Then to her consternation she saw what they were doing. On the drainboard by the sink was a pile of a dozen eggshells and in a bowl were the dozen eggs. The mother was enraged and proceeded to give the boys a angry lecture, telling them that for the rest of the day each must stay in the house and be isolated.

This is what the boys were doing: one had gotten the idea that he would poke a hole in the end of a raw egg, empty the shell, and as a joke throw it at his mother. Emptying the contents of the egg proved to be a very interesting experience, so they did it to another egg. They enjoyed it so much that they went through the whole dozen.

After her angry tirade, the mother began to think more rationally. Here she was, enraged, spoiling her day for herself and for her children over a dollar’s worth of eggs. She was ashamed, repented before God, called her children, and confessed that she had acted in a very inappropriate way. Then she made it plain that their deed was not to be repeated. Permission to do such things was needed from her. Everyone was relieved. That noon they all enjoyed scrambled eggs—and later on scrambled egg snacks.

Points to ponder

When you must do something about an incident involving your child, you need to remember some specific helps as you approach him in a positive manner.

1. Physical and verbal approach

When there is a disturbing incident among children, you must go to the scene in person. Such incidents are seldom a life-and-death matter. You need to arrive at the scene in a relaxed, casual manner. You can move rapidly without appearing hurried or upset. You seldom need to get there at top speed, with your hair flying and all out of breath.

Give thought to your first words. Even if the children are screaming and hitting, you can take a few seconds to consider what you will say or do when you get there. Tone of voice and choice of words are important. You can speak firmly, but in a kind way.

Get eye-to-eye contact. It helps to be on the same level with the person to whom you are talking. You need not stand over your children, looking down on them and they up at you. Scoop them up in your arms, or get down to where they are.

2. Attitudinal approach

What led up to the situation? Often parents bear down on children with no plan of approach. If you are to be helpful, you need to know what happened. As you drew near the group, you may have seen the whole situation or you may not have. It is equally important that you know what was said between the children. Parents tend to ignore the words exchanged between children. If you do not know what happened, your first task is not to say, “You kids, quit your fighting!” No doubt they want to quit as much as you want them to quit. Rather, your first task is to find out what led up to the situation. This need not be a cross-examination. If everyone talks to you at once, or if there is disagreement over what happened, you simply will not get the facts.

Remedy the situation. You will need to take action with or without the facts. If you can get the facts easily, you will be fortunate. If you lack information, be aware of your lack. Perhaps the children were too loosely supervised in the first place. There was no one around to see what was happening until the outburst occurred. Be slow to judge or to fix blame. Keep your questions to a minimum. Remember that your firm, kind manner will be the key to the situation. Never give a choice unless you are prepared to accept either choice. The children may need help through positive, firm adult action. You can try distraction, channeling their activities in another direction, isolation, retiring disputed equipment, kind physical restraint.

Trial and error on the part of the adult are involved. Your first attempt may or may not be successful. No one makes perfect decisions always. The final result may not mean happiness for all concerned. You may need to help a child accept frustration. This is often done best in silence. To illustrate, your child might tearfully sob, “I want that truck.” But he can’t have the truck just now. Within you, silent acceptance and sympathy for his desire are in order. This is no time for a lecture on sharing. This is the time for a demonstration.

You need to accept children’s negative reactions in a tense moment, but you need not give in to them. Remember that, in the perspective of a year of living, this is just an incident and that you are the steadying, dependable influence. You never know what your children will do next, but they ought to know what you will do next. When the incident is over, cease talking about it.

Conclusion

Parenthood is a full-time job. To qualify, you need to be a person of inner peace—the peace that passes understanding, given by God, and evidenced in the unexpected, unprepared for, unwanted twists and turns of life. This inner peace, then, makes life a fascinating, pleasant journey, wherever it may lead. Parenthood, to be successful, requires a partnership of two people dedicated to the task of blending their bodies, souls, and spirits into a unit that is dedicated to serving God and pleasing Him.

Parenthood requires an acceptance of the task, the desire to understand it, the willingness to be as diligent in preparation and performance as the most accomplished artist, business leader, or professional.

Conflicts and problems will arise. These can lead you to ever higher levels of accomplishment as you demonstrate the power of God through them. To identify problems and solve them is to find success. To cover them up or pretend they are not there is to taste defeat. Each partner should be ready and willing to see his part in any decision or task and do it as a dedicated servant of God.

There is nothing magic or accidental about living a life of happiness, peace, and joy. Building a happy family requires that you abide in Christ. There is nothing easy or automatic about it.

Guiding children implies a purpose and a goal. You need to know where you are going. You need to assume responsibility for influencing your children. Your influence for good or for ill will probably count more than any other in the lives of your children (Proverbs 22:8). You must work hard to make learning wholesome and effective for your children.

Parenthood is a twenty-year-long job. If you do your work well, you will lose your children. They will leave to attend to their own careers and families. Therefore, it is important that you should be effective partners, that you should keep in touch with each other and stay friends. You will reach your later years just as you started—only the two of you facing a new and glorious life together. You ought to train your family with this goal in mind: that when the day comes for you to say “Godspeed” to your children as they begin to plan for their own families, it will be a joyful day for both of you, with memories of happy years gone by. Then you can look ahead with a keen anticipation because you have trained your child in the way he should go (Proverbs 22:6). Then you and your partner can look deep into each other’s united souls and anticipate the time when the risen Lord will say to you, “Well done, thou good and faithful servant.” Meanwhile, with mutual consent you can say, “Bring on our new life together and let us make it a fruitful one for the glory of God.”

Study Assignment for Lesson 12

1.  Illustrate an incident when a child should be helped, not punished.

2.  What is the meaning of enforcing the setting of limits by giving help to a child?

3.  What is included in the use of this positive approach?

4.  What is the significance of unexpected incidents?

5.  List as many helps as you can find to the positive approach to children’s behavior.

6.  Write a short review of the conclusion of this course.

This course will be helpful to you if you apply its teaching to your personal life.

Self-Check Test 12

In the space provided, mark the following statements “True” or “False.”

______   1. The only thing required in teaching a child a simple rule or a simple reason is to repeat it many times.

______   2. All children need help in accepting limits.

______   3. Supervision is necessary wherever limits are set up.

______   4. Children will make a distinction between words

______   5. The secret of disciplining is the setting of reasonable limits and enforcing
                  them rigidly in kindness.

______   6. Parents need to look on every incident that happens during the day as a crisis.

______   7. The key to a positive approach is an over-all kind feeling for children.

______   8. When an unpredictable situation arises, the basic spirit of the parent is on trial.

______   9. When correcting a disturbing incident, eye-to-eye contact and a parent’s first words are both of supreme importance.

______   10. Parents need to be looking ahead to the time when their children will have grown up.

Click here for the answers to these questions.

93732 From Coping to Cure

Why are so many Christians unhappy? From Coping to Cure looks at the relief available through people helping people, through human efforts apart from God, which simply teach people to cope with their problems. Then the chapters explore the many dimensions of Christ the Cure. God’s healing love can transform the most miserable life into one of comfort, joy, and deep personal peace.

1. The Myth of Complexity

What do you say? God is, or God isn’t?

Whether they believe in God or not, everyone agrees that these words accurately describe the dark side of human behavior: hostile, hateful, resentful, rebellious, frustrated, confused, angry, cruel, selfish, dishonest, destructive. A small group (including the author) dares to call this sin and affirm there is no human remedy for sin. So what is the remedy?

2. How Can I Find Peace and Satisfaction in This World?

Why are Christians not in the least embarrassed over the absence of peace and rest in their lives?

It seems clear that the finest human effort in a magnificent world is not enough to quiet the human heart in times of trouble and stress. Based on all the options we have in going after peace, we should take careful note when Jesus gently tells us to turn to Him for peace. Learn to turn to Him, and not the world, if the peace you seek is that which is deeply satisfying and lasting.

3. Most of Us Have Had a Poor Start in Life!

Why do people blame their present behavior on their past experiences?

Secular psychologists believe that symptoms of bad behavior are socially or culturally caused, and look to a person’s past for an explanation of his or her behavior. But the Bible says contention and outbursts of anger are works of the flesh or sin. God offers us a way to receive forgiveness, cleansing, and renewal.

4. God’s Sharpest Tools, My Biggest Problems

Can you explain the change in some people’s lives when they become Christians?

I think I can change my behavior if I am just determined enough. This thinking leads to some great acting, but not to a changed and cured heart. I cannot change what I am deep down inside; only God can.

5. Sin Has Not Been Eliminated as of the Date of Publication of This Book

If you don’t know what sin is, you will inevitably suffer from its effects and probably wonder why!

We tend to deny or ignore the existence of sin. But its effects are seen throughout society. There is a supernatural cure for everyone. We don’t have to avoid the problem or run away to try to get relief. 1 John 1:9 shows us how.

6. Why Don’t You Just Concentrate on the Positive?

Is it difficult to deal with the negative in your life?

The physician and the dentist are members of professions we hold in high esteem. Yet, their focus is on finding trouble in your body. Actually, much of society focuses on correcting or preventing the negative: firemen, police, auto mechanics, lawyers, laboratories, and many others. In order to be healthy, spiritually speaking, we also need to look for trouble, a sinful condition in the body, so it can be fixed.

7. Look! Do You Want Me to Drive This Car or Do You Want to Do It?

Why do you do and say things that you later regret?

We as Christians tend to underestimate sin’s power over our behavior. I can only experience consistent peace, joy, and love when the Holy Spirit is in control of my life. Learn the five steps of confession and repentance to make this your experience.

8. Why Is It Difficult to Walk by a Mirror without Looking at Yourself?

Is the real you underneath your skin?

Very few of us would think of neglecting our appearance before leaving home. Few people get to see what you see in the mirror, and no one gets to see what goes on underneath your skin except God. If the Lord looks on the heart, then it follows that a checkup of your heart is more critical than an examination of your physical appearance. These Bible verses will give you a quick look at the current state of your heart.

9. At What Age Is It Acceptable to Sulk when You Can’t Have What You Want?

Why do adults behave childishly?

No one with childish habit patterns can have successful long-term relationships. In order to develop spiritually, we must recognize any carnality or childish, sinful behavior that continues into adult life. Once the condition is discovered, only God can cure the situation. He alone can clean our hearts from envy, strife, divisions, pouting, temper tantrums, and deceptive manipulation of others. Then we can move on to the meat of the Christian life.

10. Boom! The Wing of the Plane Smacked Me in the Head

Do you find yourself hurt or disappointed by people’s behavior or events?

What are you to do when you must work together with someone who repeats undesirable behavior over and over again, often deliberately and sadistically? Learn what the Bible says that we need to do if anyone mistreats us.

11. I Need to Forgive Those Soldiers

Has a grudge ever helped you?

What should we do if someone apologizes but keeps repeating the same unacceptable behavior? What should we do if someone isn’t repentant about actions that hurt us? Remember, God loves us and will allow circumstances to come into our lives in order to show us what is in our hearts. In order for any of us to experience the fruit of the Spirit, we must let go of our pet grudges.

12. Your Wife Has Inoperable Cancer

Is the peace of God that guards your heart and mind available in a crisis?

Can you have peace during a painful death? Where does peace come from? Peace is something that originates with God and is available to us under any conditions.

13. Living and Dying

Are most of us too busy to hear God’s whispers? Does it take a clap of thunder to get our attention?

The key to anticipating the death of the people we know and love is preparation. When you love someone and the Lord calls that person to come to Him, you will be pleased with His decision. A warm welcome from the One who loves us is what we eagerly anticipate if our conscience is clear. A prepared heart has no fear of death and what lies beyond.

14. I Prayed but I Still Didn’t Feel Right

Why do you feel good after praying sometimes, and other times you are anxious?

It seems that everyone takes his turn in enduring something he would rather not face. Praying is making our requests known to God. The decision regarding our requests is His. The evidence that you have really gotten through to God is that “the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.”

15. Anyone Who Talks about “Rejoicing Always” Just Doesn’t Understand the Real Situation

Turning everything over to God and letting Him control the situation is humanly impossible—and a fun experience.

Can one enjoy facing a crisis? I concluded that this is not humanly possible. To rejoice always requires a miracle: not just an ordinary one, but a full-blown, supernatural miracle. When we allow God to work out His plan for our lives, joy and thanksgiving will be measured in our hearts.

16. Anger Is One Letter Away from Danger

Is being a little bit angry like being a little bit pregnant?

How fast can someone become angry? Five seconds is not too fast, is it? If I can get angry in less than five seconds, I can get un-angry in the time it takes to breathe a simple prayer. It is just that simple! It has worked in my own life and in thousands of lives over the years.

17. If You Don’t Want to, You Aren’t Going to

Are your decisions in life made on the basis of whom you are trying to please?

If we put the Bible passages of Romans 5:1-5, Romans 15:13, and Hebrews 11:6 together, they tell us that walking with hope and faith while experiencing difficult times in life produces perseverance, character, love, joy, and peace. But tough times do not always produce perseverance, character, and hope; it only happens when we put our faith in the Lord.

18. The Foundation

Do you know that everyone can finish the race of life as a winner?

Seeing the lasting results in my own life and the lives of thousands of others over the last forty years has convinced me beyond any doubt that the Spirit-controlled Christian life is a miraculous experience. As long as I keep my sins confessed and ask the Holy Spirit to cleanse and fill me as often as necessary, the miracle continues.

[See more from Dr. Henry Brandt at BiblicalCounselingInsights.com]

89559.3 Is Jesus God – Khmer

តើអ្នកធ្លាប់ជួបបុរសម្នាក់ដែលជាចំណុចកណ្តាលនៃការចាប់អារម្មណ៍គ្រប់ទីកន្លែងដែលគាត់ទៅទេ? លក្ខណៈពិសេសដ៏អាថ៌កំបាំង និងមិនអាចកំណត់បានមួយចំនួនធ្វើឱ្យគាត់ខុសប្លែកពីបុរសដទៃទៀតទាំងអស់។

ជាការប្រសើរណាស់ នោះហើយជារបៀបដែលវាបានកើតឡើងកាលពីពីរពាន់ឆ្នាំមុនជាមួយព្រះយេស៊ូវគ្រីស្ទ។

ភាពអស្ចារ្យរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវគឺជាក់ស្តែងចំពោះអ្នកដែលបានឃើញ និងឮទ្រង់។ ហើយខណៈពេលដែលមនុស្សអស្ចារ្យភាគច្រើននៅទីបំផុតបានរសាត់ទៅក្នុងសៀវភៅប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រ ព្រះយេស៊ូវនៅតែជាចំណុចកណ្តាលនៃសៀវភៅរាប់ពាន់ក្បាល និងភាពចម្រូងចម្រាសគ្មានទីបញ្ចប់នៅក្នុងប្រព័ន្ធផ្សព្វផ្សាយ។ ហើយភាពចម្រូងចម្រាសភាគច្រើននោះផ្តោតលើការអះអាងដ៏រ៉ាឌីកាល់ដែលព្រះយេស៊ូវបានធ្វើអំពីខ្លួនទ្រង់ – ការអះអាងដែលធ្វើឱ្យអ្នកដើរតាម និងសត្រូវរបស់ទ្រង់ភ្ញាក់ផ្អើល។

ការអះអាងតែមួយគត់របស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវបានធ្វើឱ្យទ្រង់ត្រូវបានគេមើលឃើញថាជាការគំរាមកំហែងដោយអាជ្ញាធររ៉ូម៉ាំង និងឋានានុក្រមជ្វីហ្វ។ ទោះបីជាទ្រង់ជាមនុស្សខាងក្រៅដែលគ្មានលិខិតបញ្ជាក់ ឬមូលដ្ឋានអំណាចនយោបាយក៏ដោយ ក្នុងរយៈពេលបីឆ្នាំ ព្រះយេស៊ូវបានផ្លាស់ប្តូរពិភពលោកសម្រាប់រយៈពេល 20 សតវត្សបន្ទាប់។ មេដឹកនាំសីលធម៌ និងសាសនាផ្សេងទៀតបានបន្សល់ទុកនូវផលប៉ះពាល់លើពិភពលោករបស់យើង – ប៉ុន្តែគ្មានអ្វីដូចកូនប្រុសរបស់ជាងឈើដែលមិនស្គាល់មកពីណាសារ៉ែតនោះទេ។

តើអ្វីទៅដែលធ្វើឲ្យមានភាពខុសគ្នាអំពីព្រះយេស៊ូវគ្រីស្ទ? តើទ្រង់គ្រាន់តែជាមនុស្សអស្ចារ្យ ឬមានអ្វីផ្សេងទៀត?

អ្នកខ្លះជឿថាព្រះយេស៊ូវគ្រាន់តែជាគ្រូបង្រៀនសីលធម៌ដ៏អស្ចារ្យម្នាក់ប៉ុណ្ណោះ។ អ្នកផ្សេងទៀតជឿថាលោកគ្រាន់តែជាមេដឹកនាំនៃសាសនាដ៏អស្ចារ្យបំផុតរបស់ពិភពលោក។ ប៉ុន្តែមនុស្សជាច្រើនជឿអ្វីមួយច្រើនជាងនេះ។ គ្រិស្តបរិស័ទជឿថាព្រះពិតជាបានយាងមករកយើងក្នុងទម្រង់ជាមនុស្ស។ ហើយពួកគេជឿថាភស្តុតាងគាំទ្ររឿងនោះ។

បន្ទាប់ពីពិនិត្យមើលយ៉ាងយកចិត្តទុកដាក់នូវជីវិត និងពាក្យសម្ដីរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវ អតីតអ្នកប្រាជ្ញ និងជាអ្នកសង្ស័យនៅសាកលវិទ្យាល័យ Oxford គឺលោក C. S. Lewis បានឈានដល់ការសន្និដ្ឋានដ៏គួរឱ្យភ្ញាក់ផ្អើលអំពីទ្រង់ដែលបានផ្លាស់ប្តូរដំណើរជីវិតរបស់ទ្រង់។ ដូច្នេះ តើព្រះយេស៊ូវពិតប្រាកដជានរណា? មនុស្សជាច្រើននឹងឆ្លើយថា ព្រះយេស៊ូវគឺជាគ្រូបង្រៀនសីលធម៌ដ៏អស្ចារ្យ ប៉ុន្តែគ្មានអ្វីទៀតទេ។ នៅពេលដែលយើងពិនិត្យមើលឱ្យកាន់តែស៊ីជម្រៅអំពីបុគ្គលដ៏ចម្រូងចម្រាសបំផុតរបស់ពិភពលោក យើងចាប់ផ្តើមដោយសួរថា តើព្រះយេស៊ូវអាចគ្រាន់តែជាគ្រូបង្រៀនសីលធម៌ដ៏អស្ចារ្យបានទេ?

គ្រូបង្រៀនសីលធម៌ដ៏អស្ចារ្យ?

សូម្បីតែអ្នកដែលមកពីសាសនាដទៃទៀតក៏ទទួលស្គាល់ថា ព្រះយេស៊ូវគឺជាគ្រូបង្រៀនសីលធម៌ដ៏អស្ចារ្យម្នាក់ដែរ។ មេដឹកនាំឥណ្ឌា មហាត្មៈ គន្ធី បាននិយាយសរសើរយ៉ាងខ្លាំងអំពីជីវិតដ៏សុចរិត និងពាក្យពេចន៍ដ៏ជ្រាលជ្រៅរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវ។1 ដូចគ្នានេះដែរ អ្នកប្រាជ្ញជនជាតិយូដា Joseph Klausner បានសរសេរថា

សូម្បីតែអ្នកដែលមកពីសាសនាដទៃទៀតក៏ទទួលស្គាល់ថា ព្រះយេស៊ូវគឺជាគ្រូបង្រៀនសីលធម៌ដ៏អស្ចារ្យដែរ។ មេដឹកនាំឥណ្ឌា មហាត្មៈ គន្ធី បាននិយាយសរសើរជីវិតដ៏សុចរិត និងពាក្យសម្ដីដ៏ជ្រាលជ្រៅរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវ។១ ដូចគ្នានេះដែរ អ្នកប្រាជ្ញជនជាតិយូដា ចូសេហ្វ ក្លូសណឺរ បានសរសេរថា

វាត្រូវបានទទួលស្គាល់ជាសកល … ថាព្រះគ្រីស្ទបានបង្រៀនសីលធម៌ដ៏បរិសុទ្ធ និងឧត្តមគតិបំផុត … ដែលបោះចោលគោលការណ៍សីលធម៌ និងគោលការណ៍របស់បុរសប្រាជ្ញបំផុតនៅសម័យបុរាណ។2

ធម្មទេសនានៅលើភ្នំរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវត្រូវបានគេហៅថាជាការបង្រៀនដ៏ឧត្តមបំផុតនៃសីលធម៌របស់មនុស្សដែលធ្លាប់មាន។ តាមពិតទៅ អ្វីដែលយើងដឹងសព្វថ្ងៃនេះថាជា “សិទ្ធិស្មើគ្នា” ភាគច្រើនជាលទ្ធផលនៃការបង្រៀនរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវ។ អ្នកប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រ វីល ឌូរ៉ាន់ ដែលមិនមែនជាគ្រិស្តសាសនិក បាននិយាយអំពីព្រះយេស៊ូវថា

…គាត់បានរស់នៅ និងតស៊ូដោយមិនឈប់ឈរដើម្បី «សិទ្ធិស្មើគ្នា»។ នៅសម័យទំនើប គាត់នឹងត្រូវបានបញ្ជូនទៅស៊ីបេរី។ «អ្នកណាដែលធំជាងគេក្នុងចំណោមអ្នករាល់គ្នា ចូរឲ្យអ្នកនោះធ្វើជាអ្នកបម្រើរបស់អ្នករាល់គ្នាចុះ»—នេះគឺជាការបញ្ច្រាស់នៃប្រាជ្ញានយោបាយទាំងអស់ នៃភាពប្រក្រតីទាំងអស់។3

មនុស្សជាច្រើន ដូចជា គន្ធី បានព្យាយាមបំបែកការបង្រៀនរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវស្តីពីសីលធម៌ពីការអះអាងរបស់ទ្រង់អំពីខ្លួនទ្រង់ ដោយជឿថាទ្រង់គ្រាន់តែជាបុរសដ៏អស្ចារ្យម្នាក់ដែលបានបង្រៀនគោលការណ៍សីលធម៌ដ៏ខ្ពង់ខ្ពស់។

ប៉ុន្តែប្រសិនបើព្រះយេស៊ូវអះអាងមិនពិតថាទ្រង់ជាព្រះ ទ្រង់មិនអាចក្លាយជាគ្រូបង្រៀនសីលធម៌ល្អបានទេ។ មុនពេលយើងពិនិត្យមើលអ្វីដែលព្រះយេស៊ូវអះអាង យើងត្រូវពិនិត្យមើលលទ្ធភាពដែលថាទ្រង់គ្រាន់តែជាអ្នកដឹកនាំសាសនាដ៏អស្ចារ្យម្នាក់?

អ្នកដឹកនាំសាសនាដ៏អស្ចារ្យ?

គួរឱ្យភ្ញាក់ផ្អើលណាស់ ព្រះយេស៊ូវមិនដែលអះអាងថាជាអ្នកដឹកនាំសាសនាទេ។ ទ្រង់មិនដែលចូលរួមក្នុងនយោបាយសាសនា ឬជំរុញរបៀបវារៈដ៏មហិច្ឆតានោះទេ ហើយទ្រង់បានបម្រើស្ទើរតែទាំងស្រុងនៅខាងក្រៅក្របខ័ណ្ឌសាសនាដែលបានបង្កើតឡើង។

នៅពេលដែលមនុស្សម្នាក់ប្រៀបធៀបព្រះយេស៊ូវជាមួយអ្នកដឹកនាំសាសនាដ៏អស្ចារ្យផ្សេងទៀត ភាពខុសគ្នាគួរឱ្យកត់សម្គាល់មួយបានលេចចេញមក។ សាសនាផ្សេងទៀតទាំងអស់ផ្តល់ការណែនាំសម្រាប់របៀបរស់នៅ។ ប៉ុន្តែមានតែព្រះយេស៊ូវទេដែលផ្តល់នូវការរំដោះ ការអភ័យទោសចំពោះអំពើបាប និងការផ្លាស់ប្តូរជីវិតផ្ទាល់ខ្លួនតាមរយៈជំនឿលើទ្រង់។ សារបង្រៀនរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវគឺគ្រាន់តែ “មករកខ្ញុំ” ឬ “តាមខ្ញុំ” ឬ “ស្តាប់បង្គាប់ខ្ញុំ”។ ជាងនេះទៅទៀត ព្រះយេស៊ូវបានបញ្ជាក់យ៉ាងច្បាស់ថាបេសកកម្មចម្បងរបស់ទ្រង់គឺអត់ទោសបាប ដែលជាអ្វីមួយដែលមានតែព្រះទេដែលអាចធ្វើបាន។

ហើយនោះនាំយើងទៅរកសំណួរអំពីអ្វីដែលព្រះយេស៊ូវពិតជាបានអះអាងសម្រាប់ខ្លួនគាត់; ជាពិសេស តើព្រះយេស៊ូវអះអាងថាជាព្រះមែនទេ?

តើព្រះយេស៊ូវអះអាងថាជាព្រះមែនទេ?

នៅក្នុងសៀវភៅ The World’s Great Religions លោក Huston Smith បានសង្កេតឃើញថា ក្នុងចំណោមមេដឹកនាំសាសនាដ៏អស្ចារ្យទាំងអស់ មានតែព្រះយេស៊ូវទេដែលអះអាងថាជាព្រះ។4

តើអ្វីទៅដែលធ្វើឲ្យអ្នកប្រាជ្ញជាច្រើនជឿជាក់ថា ព្រះយេស៊ូវអះអាងថាជាព្រះ? អ្នកនិពន្ធ John Piper ពន្យល់ថា ព្រះយេស៊ូវបានអះអាងអំណាចដែលជាកម្មសិទ្ធិរបស់ព្រះ។ លោកបានដកស្រង់ការអះអាងដ៏រ៉ាឌីកាល់មួយចំនួនរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវថា

…មិត្តភក្តិ និងសត្រូវរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវត្រូវបានធ្វើឲ្យភ្ញាក់ផ្អើលម្តងហើយម្តងទៀតដោយអ្វីដែលលោកបានមានប្រសាសន៍ និងធ្វើ។ ទ្រង់នឹងដើរតាមផ្លូវ ហាក់ដូចជាមនុស្សដទៃទៀត បន្ទាប់មកបែរមក ហើយនិយាយអ្វីមួយដូចជា ‘មុនពេលដែលអ័ប្រាហាំកើតមក ខ្ញុំជា’។ ឬ ‘ប្រសិនបើអ្នកបានឃើញខ្ញុំ អ្នកបានឃើញព្រះវរបិតា’។

ឬ​ដោយ​ស្ងប់ស្ងាត់​បំផុត បន្ទាប់​ពី​ត្រូវ​បាន​ចោទ​ប្រកាន់​ពី​បទ​ប្រមាថ​ព្រះ ទ្រង់​នឹង​មាន​បន្ទូល​ថា «កូន​មនុស្ស​មាន​អំណាច​នៅ​លើ​ផែនដី​ដើម្បី​អត់ទោស​បាប»។ ចំពោះ​មនុស្ស​ស្លាប់ ទ្រង់​អាច​មាន​បន្ទូល​យ៉ាង​សាមញ្ញ​ថា «ចូរ​មក» ឬ «ចូរ​ក្រោក​ឡើង»។ ហើយ​ពួកគេ​នឹង​គោរព​តាម។ ចំពោះ​ព្យុះ​សង្ឃរា​នៅ​លើ​សមុទ្រ ទ្រង់​នឹង​មាន​បន្ទូល​ថា «ចូរ​ស្ងៀម»។ ហើយ​ចំពោះ​នំប៉័ង​មួយ​ដុំ ទ្រង់​នឹង​មាន​បន្ទូល​ថា «ចូរ​ក្លាយ​ជា​អាហារ​មួយ​ពាន់​ពេល»។ ហើយ​វា​ត្រូវ​បាន​ធ្វើ​ឡើង​ភ្លាមៗ។5

ប៉ុន្តែតើព្រះយេស៊ូវពិតជាចង់មានន័យយ៉ាងណាដោយសេចក្ដីថ្លែងការណ៍បែបនេះ? តើអាចទៅរួចទេដែលព្រះយេស៊ូវគ្រាន់តែជាព្យាការីដូចលោកម៉ូសេ ឬលោកអេលីយ៉ា ឬលោកដានីយ៉ែល? សូម្បីតែសត្រូវរបស់ទ្រង់ក៏ទទួលស្គាល់ថា គ្មានព្យាការីណាម្នាក់ធ្លាប់និយាយដូចព្រះយេស៊ូវទេ (យ៉ូហាន ៧:៤៦)។

ដំណឹងល្អបង្ហាញថា ព្រះយេស៊ូវអះអាងថាជានរណាម្នាក់ដែលលើសពីព្យាការី។ គ្មានព្យាការីណាផ្សេងទៀតបានធ្វើការអះអាងបែបនេះអំពីខ្លួនទ្រង់ឡើយ។ តាមពិតទៅ គ្មានព្យាការីណាផ្សេងទៀតធ្លាប់ដាក់ខ្លួនឯងនៅកន្លែងរបស់ព្រះទេ។

ទោះបីជាព្រះយេស៊ូវមិនដែលនិយាយយ៉ាងច្បាស់ថា «ខ្ញុំជាព្រះ» ក៏ដោយ ទ្រង់ក៏មិនដែលនិយាយថា «ខ្ញុំជាមនុស្ស» ឬ «ខ្ញុំជាព្យាការី» ដែរ។ យ៉ាងណាក៏ដោយ ព្រះយេស៊ូវជាមនុស្សដែលគ្មានការសង្ស័យ ហើយអ្នកដើរតាមទ្រង់ចាត់ទុកទ្រង់ជាព្យាការីដូចលោកម៉ូសេ និងលោកអេលីយ៉ា។

តាមពិតទៅ សេចក្ដីថ្លែងការណ៍របស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវអំពីខ្លួនទ្រង់ផ្ទុយនឹងគំនិតដែលថាទ្រង់គ្រាន់តែជាបុរសដ៏អស្ចារ្យ ឬជាព្យាការី។

  • ក្នុងឱកាសច្រើនជាងមួយ ព្រះយេស៊ូវបានសំដៅទៅលើខ្លួនទ្រង់ថាជាព្រះរាជបុត្រារបស់ព្រះ។
  • ទ្រង់​បាន​មាន​បន្ទូល​ទៅ​ភីលីព​ថា «បើ​អ្នក​រាល់​គ្នា​បាន​ឃើញ​ខ្ញុំ អ្នក​រាល់​គ្នា​បាន​ឃើញ​ព្រះវរបិតា» (យ៉ូហាន ១៤:៩)។
  • ទ្រង់​មាន​បន្ទូល​ថា «ខ្ញុំ​និង​ព្រះវរបិតា​ជា​មួយ​គ្នា» (យ៉ូហាន ១០:៣០)។

ដូច្នេះ សំណួរ​គឺ​ថា៖ «តើ​ព្រះយេស៊ូវ​អះអាង​ថា​ជា​ព្រះ​នៃ​ជនជាតិ​ហេព្រើរ​ដែល​បាន​បង្កើត​សកលលោក​ឬ?»

តើ​ព្រះយេស៊ូវ​អះអាង​ថា​ជា​ព្រះ​របស់​អ័ប្រាហាំ និង​ម៉ូសេ​ឬ?

នៅ​ក្នុង​គម្ពីរ​ហេព្រើរ ពេល​ដែល​ម៉ូសេ​សួរ​ព្រះ​នាម​ទ្រង់​នៅ​គុម្ពោត​ដែល​កំពុង​ឆេះ ព្រះ​បាន​ឆ្លើយ​ថា «ខ្ញុំ​ជា (យ៉ាវេ)»។ ព្រះ​បាន​បង្ហាញ​ដល់​ម៉ូសេ​ថា ទ្រង់​ជា​ព្រះ​តែ​មួយ​គត់​ដែល​នៅ​ក្រៅ​ពេលវេលា ហើយ​តែងតែ​មាន​នៅ​ឡើយ។

ចាប់​តាំង​ពី​សម័យ​លោក​ម៉ូសេ​មក គ្មាន​ជនជាតិ​យូដា​ណា​ម្នាក់​ដែល​គោរព​ប្រតិបត្តិ​នឹង​ហៅ​ខ្លួន​ឯង ឬ​អ្នក​ណា​ម្នាក់​ទៀត​ដោយ​ពាក្យ «ខ្ញុំ​ជា» (យ៉ាវេ) ឡើយ។ ឈ្មោះ​នេះ​បរិសុទ្ធ និង​គោរព​បូជា​សម្រាប់​តែ​ព្រះ​ប៉ុណ្ណោះ។ ប៉ុន្តែ​ព្រះយេស៊ូវ​បាន​ហៅ​ខ្លួន​ឯង​ថា «ខ្ញុំ​ជា» នៅ​ពេល​ដែល​ប្រាប់​ពួក​ផារីស៊ី​ថា «មុន​ពេល​ដែល​អ័ប្រាហាំ​កើត​មក ខ្ញុំ​ជា»។

ជា​លទ្ធផល ការ​អះអាង​ថា «ខ្ញុំ​ជា» របស់​ព្រះយេស៊ូវ​បាន​ធ្វើ​ឲ្យ​មេដឹកនាំ​ជនជាតិ​យូដា​ខឹង​សម្បារ។ ជាឧទាហរណ៍ មានពេលមួយ មេដឹកនាំខ្លះបានពន្យល់ដល់ព្រះយេស៊ូវពីមូលហេតុដែលពួកគេកំពុងព្យាយាមសម្លាប់ទ្រង់ថា៖ «ពីព្រោះអ្នកគ្រាន់តែជាមនុស្សធម្មតាម្នាក់ បានតាំងខ្លួនឯងជាព្រះ»។6

អ្នកប្រាជ្ញព្រះគម្ពីរសញ្ញាចាស់ទាំងនេះដឹងច្បាស់ពីអ្វីដែលព្រះយេស៊ូវកំពុងមានបន្ទូល—ទ្រង់អះអាងថាជាព្រះ ជាអ្នកបង្កើតសកលលោក។ មានតែការអះអាងនេះទេដែលនឹងនាំមកនូវការចោទប្រកាន់ពីបទប្រមាថ។ ការអានអត្ថបទថាព្រះយេស៊ូវអះអាងថាជាព្រះគឺត្រឹមត្រូវយ៉ាងច្បាស់ មិនត្រឹមតែដោយពាក្យសម្ដីរបស់ទ្រង់ប៉ុណ្ណោះទេ ប៉ុន្តែថែមទាំងដោយប្រតិកម្មរបស់ពួកគេចំពោះពាក្យសម្ដីទាំងនោះផងដែរ។ អតីតអ្នកមិនជឿព្រះ ស៊ី. អេស. លូវីស ពន្យល់ពីការភ្ញាក់ផ្អើលដែលការអះអាងរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវមានចំពោះមេដឹកនាំជនជាតិយូដា៖

បន្ទាប់មកមានការភ្ញាក់ផ្អើលពិតប្រាកដ ក្នុងចំណោមជនជាតិយូដាទាំងនេះ ស្រាប់តែមានបុរសម្នាក់ដែលនិយាយដូចជាទ្រង់ជាព្រះ។ ទ្រង់អះអាងថាអត់ទោសបាប។ ទ្រង់និយាយថាទ្រង់តែងតែមាន។ ទ្រង់និយាយថាទ្រង់នឹងយាងមកដើម្បីវិនិច្ឆ័យពិភពលោកនៅចុងបញ្ចប់នៃពេលវេលា។7

ចំពោះលូវីស ការអះអាងរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវគឺគ្រាន់តែរ៉ាឌីកាល់ និងជ្រាលជ្រៅពេក ដែលត្រូវបានធ្វើឡើងដោយគ្រូ ឬអ្នកដឹកនាំសាសនាធម្មតា។

តើព្រះប្រភេទណា?

អ្នកខ្លះបានអះអាងថា ព្រះយេស៊ូវគ្រាន់តែអះអាងថាជាផ្នែកមួយនៃព្រះប៉ុណ្ណោះ។ ប៉ុន្តែគំនិតដែលថាយើងទាំងអស់គ្នាជាផ្នែកមួយនៃព្រះ ហើយនៅក្នុងខ្លួនយើងគឺជាគ្រាប់ពូជនៃភាពទេវភាព គឺមិនមែនជាអត្ថន័យដែលអាចកើតមានសម្រាប់ពាក្យសម្ដី និងសកម្មភាពរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវនោះទេ។

ព្រះយេស៊ូវបានបង្រៀនថា ទ្រង់ជាព្រះតាមរបៀបដែលជនជាតិយូដាយល់អំពីព្រះ និងរបៀបដែលបទគម្ពីរហេព្រើរពណ៌នាអំពីព្រះ មិនមែនតាមរបៀបដែលចលនាយុគសម័យថ្មីយល់អំពីព្រះនោះទេ។ ទាំងព្រះយេស៊ូវ និងទស្សនិកជនរបស់ទ្រង់មិនត្រូវបានផ្តាច់ចេញពីរឿង Star Wars ទេ ដូច្នេះនៅពេលដែលពួកគេនិយាយអំពីព្រះ ពួកគេមិនបាននិយាយអំពីកម្លាំងលោហធាតុទេ។

លូវីសពន្យល់ថា

ឥឡូវនេះ សូមឱ្យយើងយល់ច្បាស់អំពីរឿងនេះ។ ក្នុងចំណោមពួក Pantheists ដូចជាជនជាតិឥណ្ឌាដែរ អ្នកណាម្នាក់អាចនិយាយថា ទ្រង់ជាផ្នែកមួយនៃព្រះ ឬមួយជាមួយព្រះ….

ប៉ុន្តែបុរសម្នាក់នេះ ដោយសារទ្រង់ជាជនជាតិយូដា មិនអាចមានន័យថាព្រះប្រភេទនោះបានទេ។ ព្រះ ជាភាសារបស់ពួកគេ មានន័យថា អត្ថិភាពនៅខាងក្រៅពិភពលោក ដែលបានបង្កើតវា ហើយខុសគ្នាពីអ្វីផ្សេងទៀត។

ហើយនៅពេលដែលអ្នកយល់អំពីរឿងនោះ អ្នកនឹងឃើញថាអ្វីដែលបុរសម្នាក់នេះបាននិយាយគឺសាមញ្ញណាស់ ជារឿងដ៏គួរឱ្យភ្ញាក់ផ្អើលបំផុតដែលមិនធ្លាប់មានដោយបបូរមាត់មនុស្ស។8

ទោះបីជានៅតែមានមនុស្សដែលជឿថាព្រះយេស៊ូវគ្រាន់តែជាគ្រូបង្រៀនសីលធម៌ដ៏អស្ចារ្យក៏ដោយ លោក Lewis បានអះអាងថាជំនឿបែបនេះប្រឆាំងនឹងតក្កវិជ្ជា។ គាត់សរសេរថា

ខ្ញុំកំពុងព្យាយាមនៅទីនេះដើម្បីការពារនរណាម្នាក់ពីការនិយាយរឿងឆោតល្ងង់ដែលមនុស្សតែងតែនិយាយអំពីទ្រង់ថា “ខ្ញុំត្រៀមខ្លួនទទួលយកព្រះយេស៊ូវជាគ្រូបង្រៀនសីលធម៌ដ៏អស្ចារ្យ ប៉ុន្តែខ្ញុំមិនទទួលយកការអះអាងរបស់ទ្រង់ថាជាព្រះទេ”។ នោះជារឿងមួយដែលយើងមិនត្រូវនិយាយ។9

ក្នុងការស្វែងរកសេចក្តីពិតរបស់គាត់ លោក Lewis ដឹងថាគាត់មិនអាចមានវាទាំងពីរផ្លូវជាមួយនឹងអត្តសញ្ញាណរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវនោះទេ។ ទាំងព្រះយេស៊ូវគឺជាអ្នកដែលគាត់អះអាងថាជា – ព្រះនៅក្នុងសាច់ឈាម – ឬការអះអាងរបស់គាត់គឺមិនពិត។ ហើយប្រសិនបើពួកគេមិនពិត ព្រះយេស៊ូវមិនអាចជាគ្រូបង្រៀនសីលធម៌ដ៏អស្ចារ្យនោះទេ។ ទ្រង់នឹងកុហកដោយចេតនា ឬទ្រង់នឹងជាមនុស្សឆ្កួតដែលមានស្មុគស្មាញជាមួយព្រះ។

តើព្រះយេស៊ូវអាចកុហកបានទេ?

ដោយបានបដិសេធលទ្ធភាពដែលថាព្រះយេស៊ូវគ្រាន់តែជាគ្រូបង្រៀនសីលធម៌ដ៏អស្ចារ្យ លោក Lewis បានសន្និដ្ឋានថាទ្រង់កំពុងកុហក ឬទ្រង់ជាមនុស្សឆ្កួតដែលបោកបញ្ឆោតខ្លួនឯង — ឬទ្រង់ជាអ្នកដែលទ្រង់អះអាងថាជា — ព្រះរាជបុត្រានៃព្រះ។

ប្រសិនបើព្រះយេស៊ូវកំពុងកុហក សំណួរដែលយើងត្រូវដោះស្រាយគឺ៖ តើអ្វីអាចជំរុញឱ្យព្រះយេស៊ូវរស់នៅពេញមួយជីវិតរបស់ទ្រង់ជាការកុហក? ទ្រង់បានបង្រៀនថាព្រះប្រឆាំងនឹងការកុហក និងការលាក់ពុត ដូច្នេះទ្រង់នឹងមិនធ្វើវាដើម្បីផ្គាប់ព្រះហឫទ័យព្រះវរបិតារបស់ទ្រង់ទេ។ ទ្រង់ពិតជាមិនបានកុហកដើម្បីផលប្រយោជន៍របស់អ្នកដើរតាមទ្រង់ទេ ព្រោះទាំងអស់លើកលែងតែម្នាក់ត្រូវបានគេធ្វើទុក្ករកម្មជាជាងលះបង់ភាពជាម្ចាស់របស់ទ្រង់។

តើអ្នកប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រជឿថាព្រះយេស៊ូវកុហកទេ? អ្នកប្រាជ្ញបានពិនិត្យយ៉ាងម៉ត់ចត់នូវព្រះបន្ទូល និងជីវិតរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវ ដើម្បីមើលថាតើមានភស្តុតាងណាមួយនៃពិការភាពនៅក្នុងចរិតលក្ខណៈសីលធម៌របស់ទ្រង់ដែរឬទេ។ តាមពិតទៅ សូម្បីតែអ្នកសង្ស័យដ៏ខ្លាំងក្លាបំផុតក៏ភ្ញាក់ផ្អើលចំពោះភាពបរិសុទ្ធខាងសីលធម៌ និងសីលធម៌របស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវដែរ។

យោងតាមអ្នកប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រ Philip Schaff គ្មានភស្តុតាងណាមួយឡើយ ទាំងនៅក្នុងប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រព្រះវិហារ ឬក្នុងប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រលោកិយដែលថាព្រះយេស៊ូវបានកុហកអំពីអ្វីមួយ។ Schaff បានជជែកវែកញែកថា

តើតាមរបៀបណា ក្នុងនាមតក្កវិជ្ជា សុភវិនិច្ឆ័យ និងបទពិសោធន៍ តើបុរសដែលបោកបញ្ឆោត អាត្មានិយម និងថោកទាបអាចបង្កើត និងរក្សាជាប់លាប់ពីដើមដល់ចប់ ចរិតលក្ខណៈដ៏បរិសុទ្ធ និងថ្លៃថ្នូរបំផុតដែលគេស្គាល់ក្នុងប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រ ជាមួយនឹងខ្យល់អាកាសដ៏ល្អឥតខ្ចោះបំផុតនៃសេចក្តីពិត និងការពិត?10

ការបន្តជាមួយជម្រើសនៃការកុហកគឺផ្ទុយស្រឡះពីអ្វីគ្រប់យ៉ាងដែលព្រះយេស៊ូវបានបង្រៀន រស់នៅ និងស្លាប់។ ចំពោះអ្នកប្រាជ្ញភាគច្រើន វាមិនសមហេតុផលទេ។ យ៉ាងណាក៏ដោយ ដើម្បីបដិសេធការអះអាងរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវ មនុស្សម្នាក់ត្រូវតែមានការពន្យល់ខ្លះ។ ហើយប្រសិនបើការអះអាងរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវមិនពិត ហើយទ្រង់មិនបានកុហកទេ ជម្រើសតែមួយគត់ដែលនៅសល់គឺថា ទ្រង់ប្រហែលជាត្រូវបានបញ្ឆោតខ្លួនឯង។

តើព្រះយេស៊ូវអាចត្រូវបានបញ្ឆោតខ្លួនឯងដែរឬទេ?

លោក Lewis បានពិចារណាជម្រើសនេះដោយប្រុងប្រយ័ត្ន។ លោកបានសន្និដ្ឋានថា ប្រសិនបើការអះអាងរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវមិនពិតទេ នោះលោកប្រាកដជាឆ្កួតហើយ។ លោក Lewis បានវែកញែកថា អ្នកដែលអះអាងថាជាព្រះ នឹងមិនមែនជាគ្រូបង្រៀនសីលធម៌ដ៏អស្ចារ្យនោះទេ។

លោកនឹងក្លាយជាមនុស្សឆ្កួត — កម្រិតមួយជាមួយបុរសដែលនិយាយថាលោកជាស៊ុតឆ្អិន — ឬបើមិនដូច្នោះទេ លោកនឹងក្លាយជាអារក្សនៃឋាននរក។11

មនុស្សភាគច្រើនដែលបានសិក្សាពីជីវិត និងពាក្យសម្ដីរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវ ទទួលស្គាល់លោកថាជាមនុស្សសមហេតុផលខ្លាំង — ផ្ទុយពីអ្នកដែលបញ្ឆោតខ្លួនឯង។ ទោះបីជាជីវិតរបស់លោកផ្ទាល់ពោរពេញទៅដោយអំពើអសីលធម៌ និងការសង្ស័យផ្ទាល់ខ្លួនក៏ដោយ ទស្សនវិទូជនជាតិបារាំងដ៏ល្បីល្បាញ Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–78) បានទទួលស្គាល់ចរិតលក្ខណៈដ៏ខ្ពង់ខ្ពស់ និងវត្តមាននៃចិត្តរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវ ដោយនិយាយថា

នៅពេលដែលលោក Plato ពិពណ៌នាអំពីបុរសសុចរិតដែលស្រមើស្រមៃរបស់លោក… លោកពិពណ៌នាយ៉ាងច្បាស់លាស់អំពីចរិតលក្ខណៈរបស់ព្រះគ្រីស្ទ។ … ប្រសិនបើជីវិត និងសេចក្តីស្លាប់របស់សូក្រាតគឺជារបស់ទស្សនវិទូ ជីវិត និងសេចក្តីស្លាប់របស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវគ្រីស្ទគឺជារបស់ព្រះ។12

ការអះអាងរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវគ្រីស្ទបង្ខំយើងឱ្យជ្រើសរើស។ ដូចដែលលោក Lewis បាននិយាយ យើងមិនអាចដាក់ព្រះយេស៊ូវនៅក្នុងប្រភេទនៃការគ្រាន់តែជាអ្នកដឹកនាំសាសនាដ៏អស្ចារ្យ ឬគ្រូបង្រៀនសីលធម៌ល្អនោះទេ។ ភស្តុតាងក៏មិនគាំទ្រគាត់ថាជាអ្នកកុហក ឬជាមនុស្សឆ្កួតដែរ។ អតីតអ្នកសង្ស័យរូបនេះបានជំរុញឱ្យយើងសម្រេចចិត្តដោយខ្លួនឯងអំពីព្រះយេស៊ូវ ដោយនិយាយថា

អ្នកត្រូវតែធ្វើការជ្រើសរើសរបស់អ្នក។ ទាំងបុរសម្នាក់នេះធ្លាប់ជា និងកំពុងជាព្រះរាជបុត្រានៃព្រះ៖ ឬជាមនុស្សឆ្កួត ឬអ្វីដែលអាក្រក់ជាងនេះ។ អ្នកអាចបិទមាត់គាត់ដោយគិតថាគាត់ជាមនុស្សល្ងង់ អ្នកអាចស្តោះទឹកមាត់ដាក់គាត់ ហើយសម្លាប់គាត់ដូចជាអារក្ស ឬអ្នកអាចដួលនៅជើងរបស់គាត់ ហើយហៅគាត់ថាព្រះអម្ចាស់ និងព្រះ។ ប៉ុន្តែសូមកុំឱ្យយើងមកជាមួយនឹងភាពមិនសមហេតុផលណាមួយអំពីការធ្វើជាគ្រូដ៏អស្ចារ្យរបស់មនុស្ស។ ទ្រង់មិនបានទុករឿងនោះឱ្យយើងទេ។ ទ្រង់មិនមានបំណងធ្វើដូច្នោះទេ។13

នៅក្នុងសាសនាគ្រឹស្តសាមញ្ញ លោក Lewis ស្វែងយល់ពីជម្រើសទាក់ទងនឹងអត្តសញ្ញាណរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវ ដោយសន្និដ្ឋានថាទ្រង់ពិតជាអ្នកដែលទ្រង់អះអាង។ ការពិនិត្យយ៉ាងប្រុងប្រយ័ត្នរបស់គាត់អំពីជីវិត និងពាក្យរបស់ព្រះយេស៊ូវបាននាំឱ្យទេពកោសល្យអក្សរសាស្ត្រដ៏អស្ចារ្យនេះលះបង់ជំនឿមិនជឿព្រះពីមុនរបស់គាត់ ហើយក្លាយជាគ្រិស្តបរិស័ទដែលប្តេជ្ញាចិត្ត។

សំណួរដ៏ធំបំផុតនៅក្នុងប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រមនុស្សជាតិគឺ “តើព្រះយេស៊ូវគ្រីស្ទពិតប្រាកដជានរណា?” លោក Lewis និងអ្នកផ្សេងទៀតរាប់មិនអស់បានសន្និដ្ឋានថាព្រះបានយាងមកភពផែនដីរបស់យើងក្នុងទម្រង់ជាមនុស្ស។


Endnotes

89545.3 Is Jesus God – Indonesian

Apakah Anda pernah bertemu dengan seorang pria yang menjadi fokus perhatian ke mana pun dia pergi? Beberapa karakteristik misterius dan tak terdefinisi membedakannya dari semua pria lain.

Nah, begitulah dua ribu tahun yang lalu dengan Yesus Kristus.

Kebesaran Yesus jelas bagi semua orang yang melihat dan mendengar Dia. Dan sementara kebanyakan orang besar akhirnya memudar menjadi buku sejarah, Yesus masih menjadi fokus dari ribuan buku dan kontroversi media yang tak ada habisnya. Dan banyak dari kontroversi itu berpusat pada klaim radikal yang dibuat Yesus tentang dirinya sendiri — klaim yang mengejutkan para pengikut dan musuh-musuhnya.

Klaim unik Yesus menyebabkan dia dipandang sebagai ancaman oleh otoritas Romawi dan hierarki Yahudi. Meskipun ia adalah orang luar yang tidak memiliki kepercayaan atau kekuatan politik, dalam waktu tiga tahun, Yesus mengubah dunia selama 20 abad berikutnya. Pemimpin moral dan agama lainnya telah meninggalkan dampak pada dunia kita — tetapi tidak seperti putra tukang kayu yang tidak dikenal dari Nazaret.

Apa yang membuat perbedaan tentang Yesus Kristus? Apakah dia hanya seorang pria hebat, atau sesuatu yang lebih?

Beberapa orang percaya bahwa Yesus hanyalah seorang guru moral yang hebat; yang lain percaya bahwa Yesus hanyalah pemimpin agama terbesar di dunia. Tetapi banyak yang percaya sesuatu yang jauh lebih banyak. Orang Kristen percaya bahwa Tuhan benar-benar mengunjungi kita dalam bentuk manusia. Dan mereka percaya bukti mendukung hal itu.

Setelah dengan cermat memeriksa kehidupan dan kata-kata Yesus, mantan sarjana Oxford dan skeptis, CS Lewis, sampai pada kesimpulan mengejutkan tentang dia yang mengubah jalan hidupnya. Siapakah Yesus yang sesungguhnya? Banyak yang akan menjawab bahwa Yesus adalah seorang guru moral yang hebat, tetapi tidak lebih. Ketika kita melihat lebih dalam pada orang yang paling kontroversial di dunia, kita mulai dengan bertanya: mungkinkah Yesus hanya seorang guru moral yang hebat?

Guru Moral yang Hebat?

Bahkan mereka yang berasal dari agama lain mengakui bahwa Yesus adalah seorang guru moral yang hebat. Pemimpin India, Mahatma Gandhi, sangat memuji kehidupan Yesus yang benar dan kata-kata yang mendalam.1 Demikian juga, sarjana Yahudi Joseph Klausner menulis,

Hal ini diakui secara universal … bahwa Kristus mengajarkan etika yang paling murni dan teragung … yang melemparkan ajaran moral dan pepatah dari orang-orang paling bijaksana dari zaman kuno jauh ke dalam naungan.2

Khotbah Yesus di Bukit telah disebut sebagai ajaran etika manusia yang paling superlatif yang pernah diucapkan oleh seorang individu. Bahkan, banyak dari apa yang kita kenal sekarang sebagai “persamaan hak” sebagian besar merupakan hasil dari ajaran Yesus. Sejarawan Will Durant, seorang non-Kristen, berkata tentang Yesus bahwa,

… dia hidup dan berjuang tanpa henti untuk ‘persamaan hak’; di zaman modern dia akan dikirim ke Siberia. “Dia yang terbesar di antara kamu, biarlah dia menjadi hambamu”—ini adalah pembalikan dari semua kebijaksanaan politik, dari semua kewarasan.3

Banyak orang, seperti Gandhi, telah mencoba memisahkan ajaran Yesus tentang etika dari klaimnya tentang dirinya sendiri, percaya bahwa dia hanyalah orang hebat yang mengajarkan prinsip-prinsip moral yang tinggi.

Tetapi jika Yesus salah mengklaim sebagai Allah, dia tidak bisa menjadi guru moral yang baik. Sebelum kita melihat apa yang Yesus katakan, kita perlu memeriksa kemungkinan bahwa dia hanyalah seorang pemimpin agama yang hebat?

Pemimpin Agama yang Hebat?

Anehnya, Yesus tidak pernah mengaku sebagai pemimpin agama. Dia tidak pernah masuk ke dalam politik agama atau mendorong agenda yang ambisius, dan dia melayani hampir seluruhnya di luar kerangka agama yang mapan.

Ketika seseorang membandingkan Yesus dengan para pemimpin agama besar lainnya, perbedaan yang luar biasa muncul. Semua agama lain memberikan instruksi untuk cara hidup. Tetapi hanya Yesus yang menawarkan pembebasan, pengampunan atas dosa, dan transformasi kehidupan pribadi melalui iman di dalam Dia. Pesan pengajaran Yesus hanyalah “Datanglah kepada-Ku” atau “Ikutlah Aku” atau “Patuhi Aku.” Juga, Yesus menjelaskan bahwa misi utamanya adalah mengampuni dosa, sesuatu yang hanya bisa dilakukan oleh Allah.

Dan itu membawa kita pada pertanyaan tentang apa yang sebenarnya Yesus klaim untuk dirinya sendiri; secara khusus, apakah Yesus mengklaim sebagai Allah?

Apakah Yesus Mengaku Sebagai Allah?

Dalam The World’s Great Religions, Huston Smith mengamati bahwa dari semua pemimpin agama besar, hanya Yesus yang mengaku ilahi.4

Apa yang meyakinkan banyak sarjana bahwa Yesus mengaku sebagai Allah? Penulis, John Piper menjelaskan bahwa Yesus mengklaim kekuasaan yang unik milik Allah. Dia mengutip beberapa klaim radikal Yesus,

… Teman-teman dan musuh-musuh Yesus terhuyung-huyung lagi dan lagi oleh apa yang dia katakan dan lakukan. Dia akan berjalan di jalan, tampaknya seperti orang lain, kemudian berbalik dan mengatakan sesuatu seperti, ‘Sebelum Abraham, saya.’ Atau “Jika kamu telah melihat Aku, kamu telah melihat Bapa.”

Atau, dengan sangat tenang, setelah dituduh menghujat, ia akan berkata, “Anak Manusia memiliki otoritas di bumi untuk mengampuni dosa.” Untuk orang mati ia mungkin hanya berkata, ‘Ayo maju,’ atau ‘Bangkit.’ Dan mereka akan patuh. Untuk badai di laut dia akan berkata, ‘Diam.’ Dan untuk sepotong roti dia akan berkata, ‘Menjadi seribu makanan.’ Hal ini dilakukan dengan segera.5

Tetapi apa yang Yesus maksudkan dengan pernyataan-pernyataan seperti itu? Mungkinkah Yesus hanyalah seorang nabi seperti Musa atau Elia, atau Daniel? Bahkan musuh-musuhnya mengakui bahwa tidak ada nabi yang pernah berbicara seperti Yesus (Yohanes 7:46).

Injil mengungkapkan bahwa Yesus mengaku sebagai seseorang yang lebih dari seorang nabi. Tidak ada nabi lain yang membuat klaim seperti itu tentang dirinya sendiri; pada kenyataannya, tidak ada nabi lain yang pernah menempatkan dirinya di tempat Allah.

Meskipun Yesus tidak pernah secara eksplisit berkata, “Aku adalah Allah,” Dia juga tidak pernah berkata, “Aku adalah seorang manusia,” atau “Aku adalah seorang nabi.” Namun Yesus tidak diragukan lagi adalah manusia, dan para pengikutnya menganggapnya sebagai nabi seperti Musa dan Elia.

Kenyataannya, pernyataan Yesus tentang dirinya sendiri bertentangan dengan anggapan bahwa ia hanyalah seorang yang hebat atau seorang nabi.

  • Pada lebih dari satu kesempatan, Yesus menyebut dirinya sebagai Anak Allah.
  • Ia berkata kepada Filipus, “Jika kamu melihat Aku, kamu telah melihat Bapa” (Yohanes 14:9).
  • Dia berkata, “Aku dan Bapa-Ku adalah satu” (Yohanes 10:30).

Jadi, pertanyaannya adalah: “Apakah Yesus mengaku sebagai Allah Ibrani yang menciptakan alam semesta?”

Apakah Yesus Mengaku Sebagai Allah Abraham & Musa?

Dalam Alkitab Ibrani, ketika Musa bertanya kepada Allah namanya di semak-semak yang terbakar, Allah menjawab, “AKULAH AKU (Yahweh).” Allah menyatakan kepada Musa bahwa ia adalah satu-satunya Allah yang berada di luar waktu dan selalu ada.

Sejak zaman Musa, tidak ada orang Yahudi yang mempraktekkan akan pernah merujuk pada dirinya sendiri atau orang lain dengan “AKU” (Yahweh). Nama itu suci dan dihormati secara eksklusif untuk Tuhan. Namun Yesus menyebut dirinya sebagai “Aku,” ketika mengatakan kepada orang-orang Farisi, “Sebelum Abraham ada, aku ada.”

Akibatnya, pernyataan “AKULAH AKU” Yesus membuat marah para pemimpin Yahudi. Suatu kali, misalnya, beberapa pemimpin menjelaskan kepada Yesus mengapa mereka mencoba membunuhnya: “Karena kamu, seorang pria belaka, telah menjadikan dirimu Tuhan.”6

Para sarjana Perjanjian Lama ini tahu persis apa yang Yesus katakan—ia mengaku sebagai Allah, Pencipta alam semesta. Hanya klaim inilah yang akan membawa tuduhan penghujatan. Membaca ke dalam teks yang Yesus klaim sebagai Allah jelas dibenarkan, tidak hanya dengan kata-katanya, tetapi juga oleh reaksi mereka terhadap kata-kata itu. Mantan ateis C. S. Lewis menjelaskan betapa terkejutnya klaim Yesus terhadap para pemimpin Yahudi:

Kemudian datang kejutan yang nyata, di antara orang-orang Yahudi ini tiba-tiba muncul seorang pria yang berbicara seolah-olah Dia adalah Tuhan. Dia mengaku mengampuni dosa. Dia bilang dia selalu ada. Ia berkata bahwa Ia akan datang untuk menghakimi dunia pada akhir zaman.7

Bagi Lewis, klaim Yesus terlalu radikal dan mendalam untuk dibuat oleh seorang guru biasa atau pemimpin agama (Untuk melihat lebih mendalam pada klaim Yesus akan keilahian, lihat Lampiran halaman 82, Apakah Yesus mengklaim sebagai Tuhan?).

Tuhan yang seperti apa?

Beberapa orang berpendapat bahwa Yesus hanya mengaku sebagai bagian dari Allah. Tetapi gagasan bahwa kita semua adalah bagian dari Allah, dan bahwa di dalam diri kita adalah benih keilahian, sama sekali bukan makna yang mungkin untuk kata-kata dan tindakan Yesus.

Yesus mengajarkan bahwa ia adalah Allah dalam cara orang Yahudi memahami Allah dan cara Kitab Suci Ibrani menggambarkan Allah, bukan dalam cara gerakan Zaman Baru memahami Allah. Baik Yesus maupun pendengarnya tidak disapih di Star Wars, dan ketika mereka berbicara tentang Tuhan, mereka tidak berbicara tentang kekuatan kosmik.

Lewis menjelaskan,

Sekarang mari kita perjelas ini. Di kalangan Panteis, seperti orang India, siapa pun bisa mengatakan bahwa ia adalah bagian dari Tuhan, atau satu dengan Tuhan.

Tetapi orang ini, karena Dia adalah seorang Yahudi, tidak bisa berarti Tuhan seperti itu. Tuhan, dalam bahasa mereka, berarti Makhluk di luar dunia, yang telah membuatnya dan sangat berbeda dari yang lain.

Dan ketika Anda telah memahami itu, Anda akan melihat bahwa apa yang dikatakan orang ini, cukup sederhana, hal yang paling mengejutkan yang pernah diucapkan oleh bibir manusia.8

Meskipun masih ada orang yang percaya bahwa Yesus hanyalah seorang guru moral yang hebat, Lewis berpendapat bahwa kepercayaan seperti itu menentang logika. Dia menulis,

Saya mencoba di sini untuk mencegah siapa pun mengatakan hal yang sangat bodoh yang sering dikatakan orang tentang Dia: ‘Saya siap untuk menerima Yesus sebagai guru moral yang hebat, tetapi saya tidak menerima klaimnya sebagai Tuhan.’ Itulah satu hal yang tidak boleh kita katakan.9

Dalam pencariannya akan kebenaran, Lewis tahu bahwa dia tidak dapat memiliki keduanya dengan identitas Yesus. Entah Yesus adalah siapa yang dia klaim sebagai – Allah dalam daging – atau klaimnya salah. Dan jika mereka salah, Yesus tidak bisa menjadi guru moral yang hebat. Dia akan berbohong dengan sengaja, atau dia akan menjadi orang gila dengan kompleks Dewa.

Mungkinkah Yesus Berbohong?

Setelah menolak kemungkinan bahwa Yesus hanyalah seorang guru moral yang hebat, Lewis menyimpulkan bahwa dia berbohong, atau dia adalah orang gila yang menipu diri sendiri — atau dia adalah siapa yang dia klaim sebagai — Anak Allah.

Jika Yesus berbohong, pertanyaan yang harus kita hadapi adalah: Apa yang mungkin bisa memotivasi Yesus untuk menjalani seluruh hidupnya sebagai kebohongan? Ia mengajarkan bahwa Allah menentang dusta dan kemunafikan, sehingga ia tidak akan melakukannya untuk menyenangkan Bapa-Nya. Dia tentu saja tidak berbohong untuk kepentingan pengikutnya, karena semua kecuali satu martir daripada melepaskan Ketuhanan-Nya.

Apakah para sejarawan percaya bahwa Yesus berbohong? Para sarjana telah meneliti kata-kata dan kehidupan Yesus untuk melihat apakah ada bukti cacat dalam karakter moralnya. Bahkan, bahkan skeptis yang paling bersemangat tertegun oleh kemurnian moral dan etika Yesus.

Menurut sejarawan Philip Schaff, tidak ada bukti, baik dalam sejarah gereja atau dalam sejarah sekuler bahwa Yesus berbohong tentang apa pun. Schaff berpendapat,

Bagaimana, atas nama logika, akal sehat, dan pengalaman, seorang manusia yang licik, egois, dan bejat dapat menemukan, dan secara konsisten dipertahankan dari awal hingga akhir, karakter paling murni dan paling mulia yang dikenal dalam sejarah dengan udara kebenaran dan realitas yang paling sempurna?10

Untuk pergi dengan pilihan pembohong adalah bertentangan langsung dengan segala sesuatu yang Yesus ajarkan, hidup, dan mati untuk. Bagi sebagian besar ilmuwan, itu tidak masuk akal. Namun, untuk menyangkal klaim Yesus, seseorang harus datang dengan beberapa penjelasan. Dan jika klaim Yesus tidak benar, dan dia tidak berbohong, satu-satunya pilihan yang tersisa adalah bahwa dia pasti telah menipu diri sendiri.

Mungkinkah Yesus Menipu Diri Sendiri?

Lewis mempertimbangkan opsi ini dengan hati-hati. Dia menyimpulkan bahwa jika klaim Yesus tidak benar, maka dia pasti gila. Lewis beralasan bahwa seseorang yang mengaku sebagai Tuhan tidak akan menjadi guru moral yang hebat.

Dia akan menjadi orang gila – pada tingkat dengan orang yang mengatakan dia adalah telur rebus – atau dia akan menjadi Iblis Neraka.11

Kebanyakan orang yang telah mempelajari kehidupan dan kata-kata Yesus mengakui dia sebagai orang yang sangat rasional—kebalikan dari seseorang yang menipu diri sendiri. Meskipun hidupnya sendiri dipenuhi dengan amoralitas dan skeptisisme pribadi, filsuf Prancis terkenal Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-78) mengakui karakter dan kehadiran pikiran Yesus yang superior, menyatakan,

Ketika Plato menggambarkan orang benar imajinernya … dia menggambarkan dengan tepat karakter Kristus. …Jika hidup dan mati Socrates adalah hidup seorang filsuf, hidup dan mati Yesus Kristus adalah hidup seorang Allah.12

Klaim Yesus Kristus memaksa kita untuk memilih. Seperti yang dinyatakan Lewis, kita tidak bisa menempatkan Yesus dalam kategori hanya sebagai pemimpin agama yang hebat atau guru moral yang baik. Bukti juga tidak mendukung dia menjadi pembohong atau orang gila.  Mantan skeptis ini menantang kita untuk membuat pikiran kita sendiri tentang Yesus, menyatakan,

Anda harus membuat pilihan Anda. Entah orang ini adalah, dan adalah, Anak Allah: atau orang gila atau sesuatu yang lebih buruk. Kau bisa membungkam Dia untuk orang bodoh, kau bisa meludahi Dia dan membunuhnya sebagai iblis atau kau bisa jatuh di kakinya dan memanggil Dia Tuhan dan Tuhan. Tetapi janganlah kita datang dengan omong kosong yang merendahkan tentang Dia sebagai guru manusia yang hebat. Dia tidak membiarkan hal itu terbuka untuk kita. Dia tidak bermaksud.13

Dalam Mere Christianity, Lewis mengeksplorasi pilihan mengenai identitas Yesus, menyimpulkan bahwa dia persis seperti yang dia klaim. Pemeriksaannya yang cermat terhadap kehidupan dan kata-kata Yesus menyebabkan kejeniusan sastra yang hebat ini meninggalkan ateisme sebelumnya dan menjadi seorang Kristen yang berkomitmen.

Pertanyaan terbesar dalam sejarah manusia adalah, “Siapakah Yesus Kristus yang sesungguhnya?”  Lewis dan banyak orang lain telah menyimpulkan bahwa Tuhan mengunjungi planet kita dalam bentuk manusia.


Endnotes

89507.3 Is Jesus God – Bengali

আপনার কি কখনো এমন কোনো ব্যক্তির সঙ্গে দেখা হয়েছে, যিনি যেখানেই যান না কেন, তার প্রতি মনোযোগ কেন্দ্রীভূত করেছেন? কিছু রহস্যময়, অনির্বচনীয় বৈশিষ্ট্য তাকে অন্য সমস্ত পুরুষদের থেকে পৃথক করে।

ওয়েল, এটা ভাবে এটা ছিল দুই হাজার বছর আগে যীশু খ্রীষ্টের সঙ্গে।

যারা তাঁকে দেখেছিল ও শুনেছিল, তাদের কাছে যিশুর মহিমা স্পষ্ট ছিল। আর যদিও সবচেয়ে মহান ব্যক্তিরা শেষ পর্যন্ত ইতিহাসের বইগুলিতে বিলীন হয়ে যায়, যীশু এখনও হাজার হাজার বই এবং অন্তহীন মিডিয়া বিতর্কের কেন্দ্রবিন্দু। আর সেই বিতর্কের অধিকাংশই যিশু নিজের সম্বন্ধে যে-মৌলিক দাবিগুলো করেছিলেন, সেগুলোর ওপর কেন্দ্রীভূত—দাবি করে যে, তাঁর অনুসারী ও তাঁর বিরোধী উভয়কেই চমৎকৃত করেছিল।

যিশুর অদ্বিতীয় দাবিগুলো তাকে রোমীয় কর্তৃপক্ষ ও যিহুদি উচ্চপদস্থ ব্যক্তি, উভয়ের কাছ থেকেই এক হুমকি হিসেবে দেখা হতো। যদিও তিনি এমন একজন বহিরাগত ব্যক্তি ছিলেন, যার কোনো প্রমাণপত্র বা রাজনৈতিক শক্তি ছিল না কিন্তু তিন বছরের মধ্যে যিশু পরবর্তী ২০ শতাব্দীর জন্য জগৎকে পরিবর্তন করেছিলেন। অন্যান্য নৈতিক ও ধর্মীয় নেতারা আমাদের জগতের ওপর এক প্রভাব ফেলেছে—কিন্তু সেই অপরিচিত ছুতোর মিস্ত্রির ছেলে নাসরতের মতো নয়।

যিশু খ্রিস্ট সম্বন্ধে কী বলা যায়? তিনি কি নিছক একজন মহান ব্যক্তি ছিলেন, নাকি আরও কিছু?

কেউ কেউ মনে করে যে, যিশু ছিলেন নিছক একজন মহান নৈতিক শিক্ষক; অন্যেরা বিশ্বাস করে যে, তিনি কেবল বিশ্বের সর্বমহান ধর্মের নেতা ছিলেন। কিন্তু অনেকেই আরও অনেক কিছু বিশ্বাস করেন। খ্রিস্টানরা বিশ্বাস করে যে, ঈশ্বর প্রকৃতপক্ষে মানুষের আকারে আমাদের পরিদর্শন করেছিলেন। এবং তারা প্রমাণকে সমর্থন করে বলে বিশ্বাস করে।

যিশুর জীবন ও কথাগুলো মনোযোগের সঙ্গে পরীক্ষা করার পর, প্রাক্তন অক্সফোর্ড পণ্ডিত ও সন্দেহবাদী সি. এস. লুইস তাঁর সম্বন্ধে এক চমকপ্রদ উপসংহারে আসেন, যা তাঁর জীবনধারাকে পালটে দিয়েছিল। তাহলে, প্রকৃত যীশু কে? অনেকে উত্তর দেবে যে, যিশু একজন মহৎ নৈতিক শিক্ষক ছিলেন কিন্তু এর চেয়ে বেশি কিছু ছিল না। আমরা বিশ্বের সবচেয়ে বিতর্কিত ব্যক্তি গভীর চেহারা নিতে হিসাবে, আমরা জিজ্ঞাসা করে শুরু: যীশু নিছক একটি মহান নৈতিক শিক্ষক হতে পারে?

মহান নৈতিক শিক্ষক?

এমনকি অন্যান্য ধর্মের লোকেরাও স্বীকার করে যে, যিশু ছিলেন একজন মহান নৈতিক শিক্ষক। ভারতীয় নেতা, মহাত্মা গান্ধী, যীশুর ধার্মিক জীবন এবং গভীর শব্দ সম্পর্কে প্রশংসা করেন। 1 একইভাবে, ইহুদি পণ্ডিত জোসেফ ক্লৌসনার লিখেছেন,

এটি সর্বজনস্বীকৃত … যে খ্রিস্ট নিখুঁত এবং নিকৃষ্টতম নীতিশাস্ত্র শিখিয়েছিলেন … যা প্রাচীনকালের সবচেয়ে জ্ঞানী ব্যক্তিদের নৈতিক আদেশ এবং সর্বোচ্চ গুণকে ছায়ায় ফেলে দেয়। 2

যীশুর পর্বতে দত্ত উপদেশকে, কোন ব্যক্তিবিশেষের দ্বারা বলা মানব নৈতিকতার সর্বোৎকৃষ্ট শিক্ষা বলা হয়েছে। বস্তুতপক্ষে, আজকে আমরা যা “সমান অধিকার” হিসেবে জানি, সেগুলোর বেশির ভাগই যিশুর শিক্ষার ফল। ইতিহাসবিদ উইল ডুরান্ট, একজন ন-খ্রিস্টান, যিশুর সম্পর্কে বলেন যে,

… তিনি ‘সমান অধিকারের’ জন্য অবিরাম সংগ্রাম করেছিলেন এবং সংগ্রাম করেছিলেন; আধুনিক সময়ে তাকে সাইবেরিয়ায় প্রেরণ করা হত। ‘তোমাদের মধ্যে যে শ্রেষ্ঠ, সে তোমাদের দাস হউক’—এটা সমস্ত রাজনৈতিক প্রজ্ঞার বিকৃতি, সমস্ত সুস্থতা। 3

গান্ধীর মতো অনেকেই নীতিবিদ্যা সম্বন্ধে যীশুর শিক্ষাকে তাঁর নিজের সম্বন্ধে দাবি করা থেকে আলাদা করার চেষ্টা করেছিল, এই বিশ্বাস করে যে তিনি ছিলেন কেবলমাত্র একজন মহান ব্যক্তি যিনি উচ্চ নৈতিক নীতিগুলি শিক্ষা দিয়েছিলেন।

কিন্তু যীশু যদি মিথ্যাভাবে ঈশ্বর বলে দাবি করতেন, তাহলে তিনি কখনই ভাল শিক্ষক হতে পারতেন না। যিশু যা দাবি করেছিলেন, তা দেখার আগে আমাদের পরীক্ষা করে দেখতে হবে যে, তিনি যে কেবল একজন মহান ধর্মীয় নেতা ছিলেন, সেই সম্ভাবনা কেমন?

মহান ধর্মীয় নেতা?

আশ্চর্যের বিষয় হল, যীশু কখনও নিজেকে ধর্মীয় নেতা বলে দাবি করেননি। তিনি কখনও ধর্মীয় রাজনীতিতে প্রবেশ করেননি বা উচ্চাভিলাষী এজেন্ডা ঠেলে দেননি এবং তিনি প্রায় পুরোপুরি প্রতিষ্ঠিত ধর্মীয় কাঠামোর বাইরে পরিচর্যা করেছিলেন।

একজন ব্যক্তি যখন যিশুকে অন্যান্য মহান ধর্মীয় নেতাদের সঙ্গে তুলনা করেন, তখন এক উল্লেখযোগ্য পার্থক্য দেখা দেয়। অন্যান্য সমস্ত ধর্ম জীবনযাপনের পথ সম্বন্ধে নির্দেশনা জোগায়। কিন্তু, একমাত্র যিশুই তাঁর ওপর বিশ্বাসের মাধ্যমে মুক্তি, পাপের জন্য ক্ষমা এবং ব্যক্তিগত জীবনে পরিবর্তন আনেন। যিশুর শিক্ষার বার্তা ছিল শুধুমাত্র “আমার নিকটে আইস” অথবা “আমার পশ্চাদ্গামী হও” অথবা “আমার বাধ্য হও।” এ ছাড়া, যিশু স্পষ্ট করে দিয়েছিলেন যে, তাঁর প্রধান কাজ ছিল পাপ ক্ষমা করা, যা একমাত্র ঈশ্বরই করতে পারেন।

আর তা আমাদের এই প্রশ্নের দিকে পরিচালিত করে যে, যিশু নিজের জন্য প্রকৃতপক্ষে কী দাবি করেছিলেন; নির্দিষ্টভাবে, যিশু কি ঈশ্বর বলে দাবি করেছিলেন?

যিশু কি নিজেকে ঈশ্বর বলে দাবি করেছিলেন?

বিশ্বের মহান ধর্মগুলিতে, হিউস্টন স্মিথ পর্যবেক্ষণ করেছেন যে সকল মহান ধর্মীয় নেতাদের, শুধুমাত্র যীশু ঐশ্বরিক হতে দাবি করেছেন। 4

কোন বিষয়টা অনেক পণ্ডিতকে এই বিষয়ে দৃঢ়প্রত্যয়ী করে যে, যিশু ঈশ্বর বলে দাবি করেছিলেন? গ্রন্থকার জন পাইপার ব্যাখ্যা করেন যে, যিশু সেই ক্ষমতা দাবি করেছিলেন, যা শুধুমাত্র ঈশ্বরেরই ছিল। তিনি যীশুর কয়েকটি মৌলিক দাবি উল্লেখ করেন,

… যীশুর বন্ধুরা এবং শত্রুরা বার বার তিনি যা বলেছিলেন এবং করেছিলেন তার দ্বারা বিশৃঙ্খল হয়ে পড়েছিল। তিনি সেই রাস্তা দিয়ে হেঁটে যাচ্ছিলেন, আপাতদৃষ্টিতে অন্য যেকোনো ব্যক্তির মতো তারপর ঘুরে এমন কিছু বলছিলেন, ‘অব্রাহামের পূর্ব্বে, আমিই সেই।’ অথবা ‘তুমি যদি আমাকে দেখিয়া থাক, তবে পিতাকে দেখিয়াছ।’

অথবা খুব শান্তভাবে, ঈশ্বরনিন্দার অভিযোগে অভিযুক্ত হওয়ার পর তিনি বলতেন, ‘মনুষ্যপুত্রের পৃথিবীতে পাপ ক্ষমা করার অধিকার রয়েছে।’ মৃতদের উদ্দেশে তিনি হয়তো সহজভাবে বলতে পারেন, ‘উঠ,’ অথবা ‘উঠ।’ আর তারা তা মেনে চলত। সমুদ্রের ঝড়ের মধ্যে তিনি বলতেন, ‘স্থির থাক।’ আর এক টুকরো রুটিতে তিনি বলতেন, ‘সহস্র ভোজন কর।’ এবং এটা সাথে সাথেই করা হয়েছিল.5

কিন্তু, এই ধরনের উক্তিগুলোর দ্বারা যিশু আসলে কী বুঝিয়েছিলেন? এটা কি হতে পারে যে, যিশু কেবল মোশি অথবা এলিয় অথবা দানিয়েলের মতো একজন ভাববাদী ছিলেন? এমনকি তার শত্রুরাও স্বীকার করেছিল যে কোনও ভাববাদী কখনও যিশুর (যোহন 7: 46) মতো কথা বলেন নি।

সুসমাচারের বইগুলো দেখায় যে, যিশু নিজেকে একজন ভাববাদী ছাড়াও আরও বেশি কিছু বলে দাবি করেছিলেন। অন্য কোনও ভাববাদী নিজের সম্পর্কে এই ধরনের দাবি করেননি; বস্তুত, অন্য কোনও ভাববাদী কখনও নিজেকে ঈশ্বরের স্থানে রাখেননি।

যদিও যীশু কখনও স্পষ্টভাবে বলেননি, “আমি ঈশ্বর,” তিনি আরও বলেননি, “আমি একজন মানুষ,” অথবা “আমি একজন ভাববাদী।” তবুও যীশু নিঃসন্দেহে মানুষ ছিলেন এবং তাঁর অনুগামীরা তাঁকে মোশি ও এলিয়ের মত একজন ভাববাদী বলে গণ্য করেছিলেন।

বস্তুতপক্ষে, নিজের সম্বন্ধে যিশুর বিবৃতিগুলো এই ধারণার সঙ্গে সাংঘর্ষিক যে, তিনি কেবল একজন মহান ব্যক্তি অথবা একজন ভাববাদী ছিলেন।

  • একাধিকবার যিশু নিজেকে ঈশ্বরের পুত্র বলে উল্লেখ করেছিলেন।
  • তিনি ফিলিপ বলেন, “আপনি যদি আমাকে দেখে থাকেন, আপনি পিতাকে দেখেছেন” (জন 14: 9)।
  • তিনি বললেন, “আমি ও আমার পিতা এক” (জন 10: 30)।

তাই, প্রশ্ন হল: “যিশু কি নিজেকে সেই ইব্রীয় ঈশ্বর বলে দাবি করছিলেন, যিনি এই নিখিলবিশ্ব সৃষ্টি করেছেন?”

যিশু কি নিজেকে অব্রাহাম ও মোশির ঈশ্বর বলে দাবি করেছিলেন?

ইব্রীয় শাস্ত্রে, মোশি যখন জ্বলন্ত ঝোপের সামনে ঈশ্বরকে তাঁর নাম জিজ্ঞেস করেছিলেন, তখন ঈশ্বর উত্তর দিয়েছিলেন, “আমি (ইয়াওয়ে)।” ঈশ্বর মোশির কাছে প্রকাশ করছিলেন যে, তিনিই হলেন একমাত্র ঈশ্বর, যিনি সময়ের বাইরে এবং সবসময় অস্তিত্বে রয়েছেন।

মোশির সময় থেকে, কোন যিহূদী অনুশীলনকারী কখনও “আমি আছি” (ইয়াওয়ে) দ্বারা নিজেকে বা অন্য কাউকে নির্দেশ করতেন না। এই নামটি ঈশ্বরের কাছে পবিত্র ও সম্মানিত ছিল। তবুও যীশু নিজেকে “আমিই” বলেছিলেন, যখন তিনি ফরীশীদের বলেছিলেন, “অব্রাহামের পূর্ব্বে আমি ছিলাম।”

ফলস্বরূপ, যীশুর “আমি একা” দাবিগুলি যিহূদী নেতাদের ক্রুদ্ধ করেছিল। উদাহরণস্বরূপ, একবার কিছু নেতা যিশুকে ব্যাখ্যা করেছিল যে, কেন তারা তাঁকে হত্যা করার চেষ্টা করছে: “কেননা তুমি মনুষ্য, তুমি ঈশ্বর হইয়াছ।”6

এই ওল্ড টেস্টামেন্টের পণ্ডিত ব্যক্তিরা সঠিকভাবে জানত যে, যিশু যা বলছিলেন—তিনি নিজেকে ঈশ্বর বলে দাবি করছিলেন, নিখিলবিশ্বের সৃষ্টিকর্তা। এই দাবিই কেবল ব্লাসফেমির অভিযোগ এনেছিল। যিশু যে ঈশ্বর বলে দাবি করেছিলেন, সেই শাস্ত্রপদটি পড়ার জন্য কেবল তাঁর কথাগুলোর মাধ্যমেই নয় কিন্তু সেইসঙ্গে সেই কথাগুলোর প্রতি তাদের প্রতিক্রিয়ার দ্বারাও সুস্পষ্টভাবে উপযুক্ত। প্রাক্তন নাস্তিক সি. এস. লুইস যিহুদি নেতাদের ওপর যিশুর দাবির সেই হতভম্বতা ব্যাখ্যা করেন:

তারপর আসল ধাক্কা আসে, এই ইহুদীদের মধ্যে হঠাৎ একজন লোককে দেখা যায় যে কথা বলতে যায় যেন তিনি ঈশ্বর। তিনি পাপ ক্ষমা করার দাবি করেন। তিনি বলেছেন, তিনি সবসময়ই ছিলেন। তিনি বলছেন তিনি সময়ের শেষে বিশ্বের বিচার করতে আসছেন। 7

লুইসের কাছে যিশুর দাবিগুলো খুবই মৌলিক ও গভীর ছিল যে, একজন সাধারণ শিক্ষক বা ধর্মীয় নেতা।

কী ধরনের ঈশ্বর?

কেউ কেউ তর্ক করে যে, যিশু কেবল ঈশ্বরের অংশ বলে দাবি করছিলেন। কিন্তু এই ধারণা যে আমরা সবাই ঈশ্বরের অংশ, এবং যে আমাদের মধ্যে দেবত্ব বীজ হয়, কেবল যীশুর শব্দ এবং কাজের জন্য একটি সম্ভব অর্থ নয়।

যীশু শিখিয়েছিলেন যে তিনি ঈশ্বর যেভাবে ইহুদীরা ঈশ্বরকে বোঝে এবং হিব্রু শাস্ত্র যেভাবে ঈশ্বরকে চিত্রিত করে, সেভাবে নয় যেভাবে নিউ এজ আন্দোলন ঈশ্বরকে বোঝে। যিশু কিংবা তাঁর শ্রোতাদের কেউই স্টার ওয়ার্স-এ দুধ ছাড়েননি আর তাই তারা যখন ঈশ্বরের বিষয়ে কথা বলছিলেন, তখন তারা মহাজাগতিক শক্তির কথা বলছিলেন না।

লুইস ব্যাখ্যা করছেন,

এখন আমরা বিষয়টা পরিষ্কার করে বলি। ভারতীয়দের মতো সর্বশক্তিমান ব্যক্তিদের মধ্যে কেউ হয়তো বলতে পারেন যে, তিনি ঈশ্বরের একজন অংশ ছিলেন অথবা ঈশ্বরের কাছে একজন ছিলেন…

কিন্তু এই ব্যক্তি, যেহেতু তিনি একজন যিহুদি ছিলেন, তাই তিনি সেই ধরনের ঈশ্বরকে বোঝাতে পারেননি। ঈশ্বর, তাদের ভাষায়, মানে পৃথিবীর বাইরের সত্তা, যিনি এটা তৈরি করেছেন এবং অন্যান্য কিছু থেকে অসীমভাবে পৃথক ছিলেন।

আর আপনি যখন সেটা ধরতে পারবেন, তখন দেখবেন যে, এই ব্যক্তি যা বলেছিলেন, তা খুবই সাধারণ, মানুষের ঠোঁট কখনও বলেনি এমন সবচেয়ে জঘন্য কথা।8

যদিও এখনও এমন লোকেরা আছেন যারা বিশ্বাস করেন যে যীশু কেবল একজন মহান নৈতিক শিক্ষক ছিলেন, লুইস যুক্তি দিয়েছিলেন যে এই ধরনের বিশ্বাস যুক্তিকে অস্বীকার করে। তিনি লিখেছেন,

আমি এখানে চেষ্টা করছি, লোকেরা তাঁর সম্বন্ধে প্রায়ই যে-মূর্খতাপূর্ণ কথাগুলো বলে থাকে, সেগুলো থেকে কাউকে বিরত করার জন্য: ‘আমি যিশুকে একজন মহান নৈতিক শিক্ষক হিসেবে গ্রহণ করার জন্য প্রস্তুত আছি, কিন্তু আমি ঈশ্বর বলে তাঁর দাবি মেনে নেই।’ এটাই সেই একমাত্র কথা যা আমাদের বলতে হবে না.9

সত্যের অন্বেষণে লুইস জানতেন যে, যিশুর পরিচয় দিয়ে তিনি উভয় দিক দিয়েই এটা করতে পারবেন না। হয় যিশুই সেই ব্যক্তি ছিলেন, যাঁকে তিনি নিজেকে—মাংসে ঈশ্বর—অথবা তাঁর দাবিগুলো মিথ্যা ছিল। আর তারা যদি মিথ্যা হতো, তা হলে যিশু একজন মহৎ নৈতিক শিক্ষক হতে পারতেন না। সে হয় ইচ্ছা করে মিথ্যা বলবে, অথবা সে হয় ঈশ্বরের কোন কমপ্লেক্সের সাথে পাগল হয়ে যাবে।

যিশু কি মিথ্যা কথা বলতেন?

যীশু যে কেবলমাত্র একজন মহান নৈতিক শিক্ষক ছিলেন এই সম্ভাবনাকে বাতিল করে লুইস এই উপসংহারে পৌঁছেছিলেন যে তিনি হয় মিথ্যা বলছেন, অথবা তিনি ছিলেন স্বঘোষিত পাগল—অথবা তিনিই ছিলেন যাকে তিনি বলে দাবি করেছিলেন—ঈশ্বরের পুত্র।

যিশু যদি মিথ্যা বলতেন, তা হলে আমাদের এই প্রশ্নটা জিজ্ঞেস করতে হবে: ‘ কোন বিষয়টা হয়তো যিশুকে তাঁর সমগ্র জীবনকে মিথ্যা হিসেবে তুলে ধরার জন্য অনুপ্রাণিত করতে পারে? তিনি শিক্ষা দিয়েছিলেন যে, ঈশ্বর মিথ্যা বলার ও কপটতার বিরোধী ছিলেন, তাই তিনি তাঁর পিতাকে খুশি করার জন্য এটা করতেন না। তিনি অবশ্যই তাঁর অনুসারীদের উপকারের জন্য মিথ্যা বলেননি, যেহেতু তাঁর লর্ডশিপ ত্যাগ না করে একজন বাদে সকলেই শহীদ হয়েছিলেন।

ইতিহাসবেত্তারা কি বিশ্বাস করে যে, যিশু মিথ্যা বলেছিলেন? তাঁর নৈতিক চরিত্রে কোনো ত্রুটি রয়েছে কি না, তা দেখার জন্য পণ্ডিতরা যিশুর কথা ও জীবন পরীক্ষা করে দেখেছে। বস্তুতপক্ষে, এমনকি সবচেয়ে অত্যুৎসাহী সন্দেহবাদীরাও যিশুর নৈতিক ও নৈতিক বিশুদ্ধতা দেখে হতবাক হয়ে যায়।

ইতিহাসবেত্তা ফিলিপ শফের মতানুসারে, গির্জার ইতিহাসে অথবা জাগতিক ইতিহাসে কোনো প্রমাণই নেই যে, যিশু কোনো কিছু সম্বন্ধে মিথ্যা বলেছিলেন। শ্যাফ যুক্তি দেখান,

যুক্তিবিদ্যা, সাধারণ জ্ঞান এবং অভিজ্ঞতার নামে কীভাবে একজন প্রতারক, স্বার্থপর, বিকৃত ব্যক্তি শুরু থেকে শেষ পর্যন্ত আবিষ্কার করেছেন এবং ধারাবাহিকভাবে বজায় রেখেছেন, সত্য ও বাস্তবতার সবচেয়ে নিখুঁত বায়ু দিয়ে ইতিহাসে পরিচিত নিখুঁত ও মহৎ চরিত্র? 10

মিথ্যাবাদীকে বেছে নেওয়ার বিষয়টা যিশুর শেখানো, জীবনযাপন করা ও এর জন্য মৃত্যুবরণ করা সমস্তকিছুর সঙ্গে সরাসরি দ্বন্দ্ব সৃষ্টি করে। বেশিরভাগ বিদ্বানদের কাছে এটি বোঝা যায় না। তবুও, যীশুর দাবিগুলি অস্বীকার করতে, একজনকে অবশ্যই কিছু ব্যাখ্যা নিয়ে আসতে হবে। আর যদি যীশুর দাবিগুলি সত্য না হয়, এবং তিনি মিথ্যা না বলেছিলেন, তবে একমাত্র বিকল্প পথ অবশিষ্ট রয়েছে যে তিনি অবশ্যই নিজেকে প্রতারিত করেছেন।

যিশু কি নিজেই প্রতারিত হতে পারতেন?

লুইস এই বিকল্পটি সতর্কতার সঙ্গে বিবেচনা করেছিলেন। তিনি অনুমান করেছিলেন যে, যিশুর কথাগুলো যদি সত্য না হয়, তা হলে নিশ্চয়ই তিনি পাগল হয়ে গিয়েছিলেন। লুইস যুক্তি দেখান যে, যে-ব্যক্তি নিজেকে ঈশ্বর বলে দাবি করেন, তিনি নৈতিক দিক দিয়ে অসাধারণ শিক্ষক হবেন না।

সে হয় একজন পাগল হবে—সেই ব্যক্তির সাথে এক স্তরে যে বলে যে সে একটি পোষ মারা ডিম—নতুবা সে হবে নরকের দিয়াবল। 11

যারা যীশুর জীবন ও কথাগুলি অধ্যয়ন করেছেন তাদের অধিকাংশই তাঁকে চরম যুক্তিপূর্ণ হিসাবে স্বীকার করেন—একজন নিজেকে প্রতারিত করার বিপরীত। যদিও তার নিজের জীবন অনৈতিকতা ও ব্যক্তিগত সন্দেহের দ্বারা পূর্ণ ছিল, প্রখ্যাত ফরাসি দার্শনিক জাঁ-জ্যাক রুশো (১৭১২-৭৮) যিশুর উচ্চতর চরিত্র এবং মনের উপস্থিতিকে স্বীকার করে বলেছিলেন,

প্লেটো যখন তার কল্পিত ধার্মিক ব্যক্তির বর্ণনা দেন… তখন তিনি ঠিক খ্রিস্টের চরিত্রের বর্ণনা দেন। … যদি সক্রেটিসের জীবন ও মৃত্যু একজন দার্শনিকের হয়, যীশু খ্রীষ্টের জীবন ও মৃত্যু একটি ঈশ্বরের যারা। 12

যিশু খ্রিস্টের দাবিগুলো আমাদের বাছাই করতে জোর করে। লুইস যেমন বলেছিলেন, আমরা যিশুকে কেবলমাত্র একজন মহান ধর্মীয় নেতা বা উত্তম নৈতিক শিক্ষক হিসেবে বিভাগে রাখতে পারি না। উভয় প্রমাণই তাকে মিথ্যাবাদী বা পাগল হয়ে সমর্থন করে না।  এই প্রাক্তন সংশয়বাদী আমাদেরকে যিশু সম্বন্ধে আমাদের নিজেদের মন গঠন করার জন্য প্রতিদ্বন্দ্বিতা করেন, তিনি বলেন,

তোমাকে অবশ্যই তোমার পছন্দ বেছে নিতে হবে। হয় ইনি ঈশ্বরের পুত্র ছিলেন এবং আছেন: নয়তো পাগল বা আরও খারাপ কিছু। তুমি তাকে মুর্খ জন্য চুপ করাতে পারেন, আপনি তাকে থু থু এবং একটি দৈত্য হিসেবে তাকে হত্যা করতে পারেন অথবা আপনি তার পায়ের কাছে পড়ে এবং তাকে প্রভু ও ঈশ্বর ডাকতে পারেন. কিন্তু তাঁর মহান মানব শিক্ষক হওয়া সম্পর্কে কোনও পৃষ্ঠপোষকতামূলক অর্থহীনতা নিয়ে আসুন না। তিনি আমাদের জন্য এই বিষয়টি উন্মুক্ত করে দেননি। তার উদ্দেশ্য ছিল না। 13

মেরি ক্রিস্টধর্মে, লুইস যীশুর পরিচয় সম্পর্কে বিকল্পগুলি আবিষ্কার করেন, এই উপসংহারে পৌঁছেন যে তিনি ঠিক যা তিনি দাবি করেছেন। যিশুর জীবনী ও কথাগুলো মনোযোগপূর্বক পরীক্ষা করা এই মহান সাহিত্যিক প্রতিভাবান ব্যক্তিকে তার পূর্বের নাস্তিকতাকে পরিত্যাগ করতে এবং একজন নিবেদিত খ্রিস্টান হতে পরিচালিত করেছিল।

মানব ইতিহাসের সবচেয়ে বড় প্রশ্ন হল, “প্রকৃত যীশু খ্রীষ্ট কে?” লুইস এবং আরও অগণিত ব্যক্তি এই উপসংহারে এসেছে যে, ঈশ্বর মানুষের মতো করে আমাদের গ্রহ পরিদর্শন করেছিলেন।


Endnotes

34418 The Next Step

Following wherever God leads you

God doesn’t show us everything at once. He doesn’t give us a map laying out everything in his plan for our lives. No, he leads us bit by bit, and we have to follow one step at a time. It can be scary. It may not be how we’d like it to go, but that’s why we need to trust. His Word is the “light on my path” (Psalm 119:105).

In their hearts humans plan their course, but the Lord establishes their steps.—Proverbs 16:9

As you do the things we’ve already talked about—look at your life from a biblical frame of mind, see God for who he really is and rely on the Holy Spirit—you’ll be more and more equipped to follow him to the wonderful destination he has for you.

The Journey vs. the Destination

We wonder if you’ve ever pondered the fact that there’s a difference between God’s will and God’s plan. They’re not contradictory; they’re just not the same.

To ask, “What is God’s will for me?” is to ask a destination question. To ask, “What is God’s will for my love life?” is to ask whether you’ll ever be married. It doesn’t address who you’ll be married to, when you’ll find that person or how the union will come about.

To ask, “What is God’s plan for me?” is to ask a journey question. It covers all of the when, where, how and who issues. Even though his will is for you to be married, ahead of you still lies a whole process of undergoing personal change, looking for the right mate, getting to know that person and moving toward marriage together. That’s his plan, and you don’t know what it looks like yet.

God’s plan requires you to trust and obey. He’ll let you know his will for you in advance, but he’ll only reveal his plan step by step. We’re back to the flashlight illuminating one piece of the trail at a time. Take the step in front of you and don’t worry about all the twists and turns that lie out of sight. God knows what he’s doing.

God’s Higher Thoughts

The reason we have a hard time giving up our headlong pursuit of our own plan in favor of following God’s plan step by step is that our plan makes sense to us. We need to cultivate a trust in God’s superior understanding. Our reasoning is natural and flawed. His reason is supernatural and perfect.

We’re not trying to get you to stop reasoning for yourself; we’re just trying to get you to adopt sanctified reasoning—reasoning that’s shaped and guided by God. The Hoy Spirit helps us to reason through Scripture and thus understand our own situation better. The result is that, rather than being mindless, “we have the mind of Christ” (1 Corinthians 2:16).

When we begin to take on the mind of Christ, and start accepting the fact that God knows better than we do, then it becomes easier to trust him as he escorts us along the journey to his best for us.

Trustworthy

Does God have the ability to lead us to the ideal mate for us? Sure, he does! He’s Almighty God. He knows us, knows the other person and is fully capable of orchestrating events to put us together as we follow his lead.

Ah, Sovereign Lord, you have made the heavens and the earth by your great power and outstretched arm. Nothing is too hard for you. —Jeremiah 32:17

Does God have the willingness to put us together with our intended mate? Again, sure! As we saw in chapter 1, he’s a loving Father who desires to give good gifts. Unless there is something unusual in his plan for our lives, marriage is a part of it.

The Lord’s unfailing love surrounds the one who trusts in him. —Psalm 32:10

And finally, does God have the integrity we need to see in order of us to trust him for a spouse? Absolutely. His faithfulness is unmatched. He fulfills every promise he ever makes.

Let us hold tightly without wavering to the hope we affirm, for God can be trusted to keep his promise. —Hebrews 10:23, nlt

The Demonstration of Trust

Real trust is not lip service or mere feelings. There must be substance behind it. There must be obedience as a demonstration of our trust. We’re talking about taking a step of faith. Just one. And then another, and another.

It’s true that the journey ahead of you might be longer than you wish. You may go through dark valleys. There might be detours and there might be drop-offs on either side. Whatever the case may be, it’s okay. If you just do the next step, you will get there. Lean on his Word and his understanding in times of seeming hopelessness, and he will provide you with the love, strength and encouragement you need to take the next step.


The above article is an abridged version of Chapter 8 of the book, Soul Mate by God (Download the free ebook in PDF). Visit SoulMatebyGod.com for more resources.

34422 Poor Decision-making

Following godly wisdom as you proceed toward God’s best for you

Most people don’t really think about how they make decisions. But it’s really important. Even if you don’t have a decision to make regarding your love life right now, someday you will. We want to help you decide how to decide.

Sanctified Feeling and Sanctified Reasoning

Just because you’re analytical doesn’t mean you’re thinking in a godly way. And just because you’re intuitive doesn’t mean you’re tuned in to the promptings of the Holy Spirit.

A long time ago, something really bad happened called the Fall. People ever since Adam and Eve have been tainted by sin, like a drop of blue food coloring staining a whole cup of water pale blue. Our heart and head were not immune to these effects. Our mind is fallen and our emotions are too.

Even for those of us who have been saved by Jesus Christ and are indwelled by the Holy Spirit, we’re still fighting our own sinful natures. At times we can engage in unsanctified reasoning and indulge in unsanctified feeling. God isn’t directing those thoughts or inspiring those emotions, so if we let ourselves be guided by them, we can easily go astray.

But it doesn’t have to be that way. Your mind can be renewed (see Romans 12:2), and your heart can be too (see Ezekiel 36:26). We’ve got a process that will help.

How to Make Holy Choices

Here is a step-by-step plan for discerning God’s will that we really like because it combines both heart and head in a way that subjects both to the wisdom of God.

Step 1. Define your situation.

Do you need to decide if the first date went well enough to try for a second date? Are you wondering what is appropriate physical touch in your relationship? Do you have some worries about compatibility with your boyfriend or girlfriend? Whatever your situation is, make sure you’ve clearly defined it for yourself so that you can specifically seek God’s will in the matter.

Step 2. Ask God to show you the larger context and spiritual influences affecting your situation.

Sometimes we forget that God has eternal purposes he is going to accomplish. A part of those eternal purposes is his master plan for you.

Your current love-life situation is being influenced by God; he wants what’s best for you. It is also being influenced by Satan, who is trying to keep you from following God and his desires for you so that you will experience the worst. So ask God to help you to look beyond the immediate circumstances to the big picture of his plan.

Step 3. Entrust your concerns to God.

Who or what is the current object of your trust and faith? Each one of us would immediately like to respond, “God, of course!” But if we are honest, who are we really trusting for the results in our current circumstances? Ourselves? Our boyfriend or girlfriend? Our friends? Our family members? Available resources, whether financial, physical or something else?

God is trustworthy. He has the ability to accomplish what concerns us (see Jeremiah 32:17). He is committed to our well-being (see Psalm 32:10). He will do what he promises (see Psalm 33:4). We can rest in his loving care and concern for us.

Step 4. Prepare yourself to hear God.

Sometimes we can’t discern God’s direction in our lives. This might be because we have sin in our lives. It might be because we need to humble ourselves before God. It might be because we’re not patient enough to wait for God. But whatever the reason, we need to remove obstacles within ourselves so that we can hear from God.

Step 5. Recognize the directional signposts.

Daniel 2:28 says, “There is a God in heaven who reveals mysteries.” We know God cares about us and will show us his plan. Once we have entrusted our situation or problem into his hands, we must expect his answer.

Be alert as God reveals his will to you through …

  • his Word, the Bible (2 Timothy 3:16–17)
  • the Holy Spirit who indwells you (John 14:26)
  • godly people (Proverbs 11:14; 15:22)
  • providential circumstances (Proverbs 16:9)

Consider what recent insights, impressions, counsel or signs have made an impact on you that may be from God.

Step 6. Test the step you’re considering.

James 1:5 provides clear direction when it tells us, “If any of you lacks wisdom, you should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given to you.”

Make sure the action you’re considering is from God. Ask yourself questions like the following:

  • Does this action comply with the directions given in God’s Word?
  • Does this solution demonstrate love for God?
  • Does this resolution demonstrate love for others?
  • Does this direction make sense when I use reasoning that is based on God’s truth?
  • Does this revelation generate a supernatural inner peace and calmness that cannot be attributed merely to your circumstances?

Step 7. Take the next step by faith.

Once you have worked your way through the preceding steps and believe that you know God’s direction, take the next step by faith, knowing that God will redirect you if necessary. You can go forward with this assurance:

The Lord himself goes before you and will be with you; he will never leave you nor forsake you. Do not be afraid; do not be discouraged. —Deuteronomy 31:8


The above article is an abridged version of Chapter 12 of the book, Soul Mate by God (Download the free ebook in PDF). Visit SoulMatebyGod.com for more resources.

34423 Pursue “Oneness” Potential

Knowing what God’s ideal is for marriage

God desires “oneness” in marriage. This oneness is first described in Genesis 2, and Jesus spoke of the oneness principle in the Gospel of Mark:

“At the beginning of creation God ‘made them male and female.’ ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.’ So they are no longer two, but one.” —Mark 10:6–8

This physical union is symbolic of the oneness God desires for us in marriage and applies to all the various dimensions that make us human. God wants married couples to grow into greater union with each other while simultaneously growing in intimacy with him.

Spiritual Oneness

For us as Christians, our spiritual lives are guided by the directive to “love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength” (Deuteronomy 6:5). God originally created man in such a way as to have an intimate love relationship with him. We were created to demonstrate that love by glorifying God in our worship, devotion and service. We believe that God wants this to also be the top priority in marriage as well.

Our personal relationship and intimacy with God is the absolute highest priority to him. While Paul is clearly stating that Christians are not to marry unbelievers, this principle of being “unequally yoked” can also have implications for two believers when it comes to their theological beliefs and spiritual lives.

If you are dating, try attending church together. It is a great way to learn more about each other and how God’s Spirit engages with each of you. You will find that the kind of church worship and teaching you like spills over into how you spend personal time with God as well.

And what about devotional times together at home? How will both of you feel the same connection with God if you are not engaging with him in the same way you had before getting married?

Are there theological differences between you and whomever you are dating that diminish your worship and devotion to God in some way? If so, step back and ask God for more clarity in your relationship. Spiritual oneness is cultivated by worshiping and serving God in unity.

Mental Oneness

The lens through which we view life determines what we see and it corresponds with choices we make. It shapes our philosophy of life, perception of reality and decision-making values.

God reveals truth and reality in the Bible. It is our guidebook for life. We have been given the Bible so that we can have a biblical point of view as we observe life. Believers need to use the Bible as the ultimate authority for daily living and be committed to renewing their minds with biblical truth.

How can two people have a harmonious relationship if they are not both submitted to the authority of the Scriptures and following biblical principles? Mental oneness is cultivated by having the same foundational beliefs and philosophy of life.

Emotional Oneness

People are emotional beings. We have deep feelings about different things. Those feelings inspire us to act. Consequently, we invest our time, money and talent into causes or activities we believe are important. We are willing to make sacrifices for causes that have engaged our heart.

What has God laid upon your heart? What do you feel passionately about? What moves you to take action? Does the person you are dating share your passions and concerns? And do you share his or hers? Emotional oneness is cultivated by being passionately involved in the same things in life.

Volitional Oneness

God created us to fulfill his purposes. The Bible explains, “We are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do” (Ephesians 2:10).

We exist to serve him wholeheartedly. Is that the desire of your heart? What about the person you are dating? Is she or he living under the banner of “Not my will but God’s will be done” (see Luke 22:42)?

The prophet Amos asks a rhetorical question: “Can two people walk together without agreeing on the direction?” (Amos 3:3, nlt). Are you both heading in the same direction in life? Are you in agreement about what you want to accomplish with your lives? Volitional oneness is cultivated by being committed to the same goals, priorities and purpose for life.

Physical Oneness

God designed sexual intercourse to be a tangible symbol of the oneness he desires between a husband and wife. It’s the pleasurable icing on the cake when spiritual, mental, emotional and volitional oneness exists in the relationship. And God doesn’t want this dimension of the relationship to be neglected either. The apostle Paul explains,

The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. —1 Corinthians 7:3–4

When you are compatible in all of these critical areas, you can have a good foundation upon which you develop greater oneness in marriage. It will be much more challenging to develop the oneness that God desires for you if you don’t begin your marriage with relatively the same views and priorities in each of these vital areas. Ask God to give you his wisdom as you seek to discern the oneness potential in your relationships.


The above article is an abridged version of Chapter 13 of the book, Soul Mate by God (Download the free ebook in PDF). Visit SoulMatebyGod.com for more resources.